Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22943565›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2012

Microsatellite markers for identification and parentage analysis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa).

Vânia Costa, Javier Pérez-González, Pedro Santos, Pedro Fernández-Llario, Juan Carranza, Attila Zsolnai, István Anton, József Buzgó, Gyula Varga, Nuno Monteiro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Infection of Feral Phenotype Swine with Japanese Encephalitis Virus.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vânia CostaCentro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto (CIBIO-UP), Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.
Javier Pérez-González
Pedro Santos
Pedro Fernández-Llario
Juan Carranza
Attila Zsolnai
István Anton
József Buzgó
Gyula Varga
Nuno Monteiro
Albano Beja-Pereira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe wild boar (Sus scrofa) is among the most widespread mammal species throughout the old world. Presently, studies concerning microsatellites in domestic pigs and wild boars have been carried out in order to investigate domestication, social behavior and general diversity patterns among either populations or breeds. The purpose of the current study is to develop a robust set of microsatellites markers for parentage analyses and individual identification.

findingsA set of 14 previously reported microsatellites markers have been optimized and tested in three populations from Hungary, Portugal and Spain, in a total of 167 samples. The results indicate high probabilities of exclusion (0.99999), low probability of identity (2.0E(-13) - 2.5E(-9)) and a parentage assignment of 100%.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that this set of markers is a useful and efficient tool for the individual identification and parentage assignment in wild boars.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsAllelesAnimalsBreedingFemaleGenetic LociGenotypeHeterozygoteHungaryLikelihood FunctionsMalePhylogenyPortugalSequence Analysis, DNASpainSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID22943565
PMCPMC3475110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.