Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22943425›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2012

Protocol for a drugs exposure pregnancy registry for implementation in resource-limited settings.

Ushma Mehta, Christine Clerk, Elizabeth Allen, Mackensie Yore, Esperança Sevene, Jan Singlovic, Max Petzold, Viviana Mangiaterra, Elizabeth Elefant, Frank M Sullivan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06833957 (PReparing for OptimalPhase III/IV maTErnal Group B StreptococCal Vaccine Trials in Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06833957 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PReparing for OptimalPhase III/IV maTErnal Group B StreptococCal Vaccine Trials in Africa (PROTECT)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBarcelona Institute for Global HealthRan2025 to 2027Enrolled18,100ConditionsGroup B Streptococcus, Invasive Bacterial Diseases (IBD), Maternal Immunization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ushma MehtaIndependent Pharmacovigilance Consultant, Cape Town, Kenilworth 7708, South Africa.
Christine Clerk
Elizabeth Allen
Mackensie Yore
Esperança Sevene
Jan Singlovic
Max Petzold
Viviana Mangiaterra
Elizabeth Elefant
Frank M Sullivan
Lewis B Holmes
Melba Gomes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe absence of robust evidence of safety of medicines in pregnancy, particularly those for major diseases provided by public health programmes in developing countries, has resulted in cautious recommendations on their use. We describe a protocol for a Pregnancy Registry adapted to resource-limited settings aimed at providing evidence on the safety of medicines in pregnancy. METHODS/

designSentinel health facilities are chosen where women come for prenatal care and are likely to come for delivery. Staff capacity is improved to provide better care during the pregnancy, to identify visible birth defects at delivery and refer infants with major anomalies for surgical or clinical evaluation and treatment. Consenting women are enrolled at their first antenatal visit and careful medical, obstetric and drug-exposure histories taken; medical record linkage is encouraged. Enrolled women are followed up prospectively and their histories are updated at each subsequent visit. The enrolled woman is encouraged to deliver at the facility, where she and her baby can be assessed. DISCUSSION: In addition to data pooling into a common WHO database, the WHO Pregnancy Registry has three important features: First is the inclusion of pregnant women coming for antenatal care, enabling comparison of birth outcomes of women who have been exposed to a medicine with those who have not. Second is its applicability to resource-poor settings regardless of drug or disease. Third is improvement of reproductive health care during pregnancies and at delivery. Facility delivery enables better health outcomes, timely evaluation and management of the newborn, and the collection of reliable clinical data. The Registry aims to improves maternal and neonatal care and also provide much needed information on the safety of medicines in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPregnancy OutcomeRegistriesAbnormalities, Drug-InducedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansPharmacovigilancePregnancyPrenatal CareWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID22943425
PMCPMC3500715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.