Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22941670›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013

Interpersonal discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United States.

Sherrill Sellers, Dasha Cherepanav, Janel Hanmer, Dennis G Fryback, Mari Palta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cross-sectional validation of the PROMIS-Preference scoring system by its association with social determinants of health.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Taking Initiative in Addressing Diversity in Medicine.Canadian journal of science, mathematics and technology education = Revue canadienne de l'enseignement des sciences, des mathematiques et de la technologie · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perceived discrimination and health-related quality-of-life: gender differences among older African Americans.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  12. It's a Matter of Trust: Older African Americans Speak About Their Health Care Encounters.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sherrill SellersMiami University-Ohio, Oxford, OH, USA. slsellers@muohio.edu
Dasha Cherepanav
Janel Hanmer
Dennis G Fryback
Mari Palta

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
SYMPTOM DURATION AND QUALITY OF LIFEP01AG020679 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FRYBACK, DENNIS G. · 2004 to 2007
$6.8M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020679NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe assessed associations between discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United States.

methodsWe examined data from the National Health Measurement Study, a nationally representative sample of 3,648 adults aged 35-89 in the non-institutionalized US population. These data include self-reported lifetime and everyday discrimination as well as several health utility indexes (EQ-5D, HUI3, and SF-6D). Multiple regression was used to compute mean health utility scores adjusted for age, income, education, and chronic diseases for each race-by-gender subgroup.

resultsBlack men and women reported more discrimination compared to white men and women. Health utility tended to be worse as reported discrimination increased. With a few exceptions, differences between mean health utility scores in the lowest and highest discrimination groups exceeded the 0.03 difference generally considered to be a clinically significant difference.

conclusionsPersons who experienced discrimination tended to score lower on health utility measures. The study also revealed a complex relationship between experiences of discrimination and race and gender. Because of these differential social and demographic relationships caution is urged when interpreting self-rated health measures in research, clinical, and policy settings.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsInterpersonal RelationsPrejudiceQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHealth ServicesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22941670
PMCPMC3973146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.