Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22941652›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

Sequence analysis of a complete 1.66 Mb Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 genome cloned in yeast.

Christian Tagwerker, Christopher L Dupont, Bogumil J Karas, Li Ma, Ray-Yuan Chuang, Gwynedd A Benders, Adi Ramon, Mark Novotny, Michael G Montague, Pratap Venepally and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. "Cell Disk" DNA Storage System Capable of Random Reading and Rewriting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Cloning and sequencing analysis of wholeFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cross-species microbial genome transfer: a Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Synthetic Genomics From a Yeast Perspective.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. An artificial chromosome for data storage.National science review · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. TAR Cloning: Perspectives for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine, and Biotechnology.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian TagwerkerDepartment of Synthetic Biology and Bioenergy, J. Craig Venter Institute, 10355 Science Center Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. ctagwerker@jcvi.org
Christopher L Dupont
Bogumil J Karas
Li Ma
Ray-Yuan Chuang
Gwynedd A Benders
Adi Ramon
Mark Novotny
Michael G Montague
Pratap Venepally
Daniel Brami
Ariel Schwartz
Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch
Daniel G Gibson
John I Glass
Hamilton O Smith
J Craig Venter
Clyde A Hutchison
Synthetic Genomics (United States) · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine cyanobacteria of the genus Prochlorococcus represent numerically dominant photoautotrophs residing throughout the euphotic zones in the open oceans and are major contributors to the global carbon cycle. Prochlorococcus has remained a genetically intractable bacterium due to slow growth rates and low transformation efficiencies using standard techniques. Our recent successes in cloning and genetically engineering the AT-rich, 1.1 Mb Mycoplasma mycoides genome in yeast encouraged us to explore similar methods with Prochlorococcus. Prochlorococcus MED4 has an AT-rich genome, with a GC content of 30.8%, similar to that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (38%), and contains abundant yeast replication origin consensus sites (ACS) evenly distributed around its 1.66 Mb genome. Unlike Mycoplasma cells, which use the UGA codon for tryptophane, Prochlorococcus uses the standard genetic code. Despite this, we observed no toxic effects of several partial and 15 whole Prochlorococcus MED4 genome clones in S. cerevisiae. Sequencing of a Prochlorococcus genome purified from yeast identified 14 single base pair missense mutations, one frameshift, one single base substitution to a stop codon and one dinucleotide transversion compared to the donor genomic DNA. We thus provide evidence of transformation, replication and maintenance of this 1.66 Mb intact bacterial genome in S. cerevisiae.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialCloning, MolecularGenes, BacterialMutationProchlorococcusReplication OriginSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID22941652
PMCPMC3488255
OpenAlexW2133824620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.