ArticleBone marrow transplantation2013
Allo-SCT for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents: a retrospective study on behalf of Swiss Blood SCT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis from 2007 to 2017.Cancer cell international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the introduction of novel drugs, cure of multiple myeloma remains rare. Allo-SCT can induce long-term remission, but randomized studies in advanced disease are lacking and the influence of novel drugs remains unclear. In our retrospective analysis of all patients with myeloma allografted in Switzerland, 95 patients were transplanted between 1988 and 2011. Most patients were heavily pre-treated, and 53% received novel drugs before transplant. In all, 51% were allografted after relapse or progression. Transplant trends changed over time with an increase in reduced intensity conditioning and unrelated donors. At the time of analysis 47 patients remained alive, with a median follow-up of survivors of 53 months. Acute GVHD II-IV and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurred in 49% and 53%, respectively; TRM at 5 years was 18%. Five-year OS and PFS were 51% and 29%, respectively. Patients who received transplant upfront vs after relapse had a significantly better outcome, as well as those who had a related donor and achieved CR post transplant. We found no impact of pre-treatment with novel drugs or cGVHD. Although long-term remission following allo-SCT can be achieved, GVHD and TRM remain major limitations. Our series suggests that benefit is highest when allo-SCT is used early in the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.