Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2012
Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03257280 (Impact on the Hospital Stay, of an Early Oral Nutrition Protocol Applied to Gastric Cancer Patients After Total Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact on the Hospital Stay, of an Early Oral Nutrition Protocol Applied to Gastric Cancer Patients After Total Gastrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial (DOPGT_2015)
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: efficacy, safety, meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Early oral feeding after laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Program in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of early oral feeding vs. traditional oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.Surgery today · 2021Pooled it
- Early vs. Delayed Feeding after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Pooled it
- The application of enhanced recovery after surgery for upper gastrointestinal surgery: Meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019Pooled it
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs for Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Application of enhanced recovery after gastric cancer surgery: An updated meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Is ERAS effective and safe in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery protocols for major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Pooled it
- Systematic review of enhanced recovery after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015Pooled it
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFast-track surgery has been shown to enhance postoperative recovery in several surgical fields. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
methodsThe present study was designed as a single-center, randomized, unblinded, parallel-group trial. Patients were eligible if they had gastric cancer for which laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was indicated. The fast-track surgery protocol included intensive preoperative education, a short duration of fasting, a preoperative carbohydrate load, early postoperative ambulation, early feeding, and sufficient pain control using local anesthetics perfused via a local anesthesia pump device, with limited use of opioids. The primary endpoint was the duration of possible and actual postoperative hospital stay.
resultsWe randomized 47 patients into a fast-track group (n=22) and a conventional pathway group (n=22), with three patients withdrawn. The possible and actual postoperative hospital stays were shorter in the fast-track group than in the conventional group (4.68±0.65 vs. 7.05±0.65; P<0.001 and 5.36±1.46 vs. 7.95±1.98; P<0.001). The time to first flatus and pain intensity were not different between groups; however, a greater frequency of additional pain control was needed in the conventional group (3.64±3.66 vs. 1.64±1.33; P=0.023). The fast-track group was superior to the conventional group in several factors of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, including: fatigue, appetite loss, financial problems, and anxiety. The complication and readmission rates were similar between groups.
conclusionsFast-track surgery could enhance postoperative recovery, improve immediate postoperative quality of life, and be safely applied in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22941233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.