ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2012
Cardiovascular management of septic shock in 2012.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glycated Hemoglobin < 6.5% Is Associated With Uroseptic Shock in Diabetic Patients With Urinary Tract Infection.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Selepressin and Arginine Vasopressin Do Not Display Cardiovascular Risk in Atherosclerotic Rabbit.PloS one · 2016Article
- Risk Factors for Development of Septic Shock in Patients with Urinary Tract Infection.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Fluid balance and cardiac function in septic shock as predictors of hospital mortality.Critical care (London, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septic shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Source control, antimicrobial therapy, early goal-directed fluid resuscitation, and infusion of vasoactive pharmaceuticals remain the cornerstones of treatment. However, the cardiovascular management of septic shock is evolving. Basic science and clinical researchers have identified novel drug targets and are testing the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. For example, prevention of microvascular leak during septic shock is the focus of active investigations and may soon provide considerable benefit to patients. Among the important topics that will be discussed in this review are the following: the role of vascular endothelial dysfunction in microvascular leak, the impact of cytokines upon structural and functional proteins within the endothelial barrier and within the heart, and the ability of selective vasopressin 1a receptor agonists to minimize tissue edema and improve hemodynamic status.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.