ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2013
Enhancement of bunker oil biodesulfurization by adding surfactant.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biodesulfurization of Fossil Fuels: Analysis and Prospective.F1000Research · 2023Review
- Biodesulfurization of refractory sulfur compounds in petro-diesel by a novel hydrocarbon tolerable strain Paenibacillus glucanolyticus HN4.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- A lipopeptide biosurfactant fromRSC advances · 2018Article
- Biocatalytic Desulfurization Capabilities of a Mixed Culture during Non-Destructive Utilization of Recalcitrant Organosulfur Compounds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- A novel metabolite (1,3-benzenediol, 5-hexyl) production by Exophiala spinifera strain FM through dibenzothiophene desulfurization.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biodesulfurization (BDS) is a promising method to remove sulfur compounds from diesel and gasoline. However, the information on BDS of heavy oil is scanty, which might be due to their "undesirable" physical properties and more complicated sulfur diversities. In this study, the BDS of one kind of heavy oil, bunker oil MFO380 was investigated. The biocatalyst was obtained by the enrichment with oil sludge as the seed and using dibenzothiophene (DBT) as the sole sulfur source. The enriched biocatalyst (microbial mixed culture) could selectively remove sulfur from DBT and DBT was transformed into 2-hydroxybiphenyl, which indicates that the BDS process is beneficial to non-destructive carbon bonds and thus can maintain the calorific value. The bunker oil BDS results showed that after 7 days of incubation, the removal efficiency of sulfur in MFO380 was only 2.88 %, but this could be significantly improved by adding surfactants Triton X-100 or Tween 20. This effect could be attributed to greatly reduced viscosity of heavy oil and increased mass transfer of sulfur compounds in heavy oil into water. Adding Triton X-100 achieved the highest removal efficiency of sulfur, up to 51.7 % after 7 days of incubation. The optimal amount of Triton X-100 was 0.5 g/50 ml medium. When toluene was added as an organic solvent for MFO380, the BDS activity was improved, while lower than the effect of adding surfactants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.