ReviewPediatric radiology2012
Ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip: what have we learned?
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07111858 (Pavlik Harness Treatment Versus Monitoring for Treatment of Graf Type 2b and 2c Hip Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pavlik Harness Treatment Versus Monitoring for Treatment of Graf Type 2b and 2c Hip Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound for hip dysplasia - disparities between community and tertiary paediatric services.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Progress in screening strategies for neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Correlation between ultrasonic and radiographic imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019Article
- The natural history of abnormal ultrasound findings in hips of infants under six months of age.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2018Article
- The pubo-femoral distance decreases with Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns.Skeletal radiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an important but poorly defined entity, the natural history of which is incompletely understood. The term encompasses a disease spectrum ranging from a stable hip with a mildly dysplastic acetabulum to complete hip dislocation. Much controversy surrounds the diagnosis, imaging and management of this condition. We present a review of the history of US imaging of DDH from the radiologist's perspective, summarising the most widely recognised US methods described to date. We discuss controversies in the approach to US examination, with particular emphasis on current opinions. The existing scientific evidence for and variations in the practice of US screening for DDH, including recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force and the ESPR DDH Taskforce Group respectively, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.