Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22939921›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2012

Recording from defined populations of retinal ganglion cells using a high-density CMOS-integrated microelectrode array with real-time switchable electrode selection.

Michele Fiscella, Karl Farrow, Ian L Jones, David Jäckel, Jan Müller, Urs Frey, Douglas J Bakkum, Péter Hantz, Botond Roska, Andreas Hierlemann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Variant-to-gene mapping identifiesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Longitudinal in vivo CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele FiscellaBio Engineering Laboratory, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland. michele.fiscella@bsse.ethz.ch
Karl Farrow
Ian L Jones
David Jäckel
Jan Müller
Urs Frey
Douglas J Bakkum
Péter Hantz
Botond Roska
Andreas Hierlemann
ETH Zurich · CHFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHRIKEN Center for Computational Science · JP

Funding

European Research Council 267351Swiss National Science Foundation 141801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to understand how retinal circuits encode visual scenes, the neural activity of defined populations of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has to be investigated. Here we report on a method for stimulating, detecting, and subsequently targeting defined populations of RGCs. The possibility to select a distinct population of RGCs for extracellular recording enables the design of experiments that can increase our understanding of how these neurons extract precise spatio-temporal features from the visual scene, and how the brain interprets retinal signals. We used light stimulation to elicit a response from physiologically distinct types of RGCs and then utilized the dynamic-configurability capabilities of a microelectronics-based high-density microelectrode array (MEA) to record their synchronous action potentials. The layout characteristics of the MEA made it possible to stimulate and record from multiple, highly overlapping RGCs simultaneously without light-induced artifacts. The high-density of electrodes and the high signal-to-noise ratio of the MEA circuitry allowed for recording of the activity of each RGC on 14±7 electrodes. The spatial features of the electrical activity of each RGC greatly facilitated spike sorting. We were thus able to localize, identify and record from defined RGCs within a region of mouse retina. In addition, we stimulated and recorded from genetically modified RGCs to demonstrate the applicability of optogenetic methods, which introduces an additional feature to target a defined cell type. The developed methodologies can likewise be applied to other neuronal preparations including brain slices or cultured neurons.

Indexed as

ElectrodesMicroelectrodesAction PotentialsAnimalsArtifactsChannelrhodopsinsData Interpretation, StatisticalDependovirusElectric StimulationExtracellular SpaceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationChannelrhodopsins

Identifiers

PMID22939921
PMCPMC5419501
OpenAlexW2150013393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.