Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22938832›Full record

GuidelineLeukemia research2012

Proposed criteria for response assessment in patients treated in clinical trials for myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase (MPN-BP): formal recommendations from the post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia consortium.

John Mascarenhas, Mark L Heaney, Vesna Najfeld, Elizabeth Hexner, Omar Abdel-Wahab, Raajit Rampal, Farhad Ravandi, Bruce Petersen, Gail Roboz, Eric Feldman and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Leukemia research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeted Therapy for MPNs: Going Beyond JAK Inhibitors.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Genomics of MPN progression.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
  19. [Chinese guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of primary myelofibrosis (2019)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

John MascarenhasTisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. john.mascarenhas@mssm.edu
Mark L Heaney
Vesna Najfeld
Elizabeth Hexner
Omar Abdel-Wahab
Raajit Rampal
Farhad Ravandi
Bruce Petersen
Gail Roboz
Eric Feldman
Nikolai Podoltsev
Dan Douer
Ross Levine
Martin Tallman
Ronald Hoffman
Post-myeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia consortium
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USCornell University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USYale University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tissue BankP01CA108671 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Ronald Hoffman · 2006 to 2026
$82.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA108671NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukemic transformation (LT) of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is associated with a dismal prognosis and no medical therapies have shown a survival improvement in patients with MPN in blast phase (MPN-BP). Effective therapies for the treatment of MPN-BP are a serious unmet need. Consensus response criteria do not exist for the treatment of patients with MPN-BP and this is necessary for the uniformed reporting of treatment response in clinical trials. We have identified relevant MPN and MPN-BP features in order to define treatment response categories that reflect hematological, clinical, pathological, cytogenetic and molecular changes after therapeutic intervention. We plan to validate these proposed response criteria within multi-centered clinical trials.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationBlast CrisisBlood CellsBone MarrowClinical Trials as TopicGenetic MarkersHumansKaryotypingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyeloablative AgonistsMyeloproliferative DisordersSpleenTransplantation ConditioningTreatment OutcomeGenetic MarkersMyeloablative Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22938832
PMCPMC4114151
OpenAlexW1985759147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.