Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22937092›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Aerial application of pheromones for mating disruption of an invasive moth as a potential eradication tool.

Eckehard G Brockerhoff, David M Suckling, Mark Kimberley, Brian Richardson, Graham Coker, Stefan Gous, Jessica L Kerr, David M Cowan, David R Lance, Tara Strand and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mating Disruption ofInsects · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  7. Towards pesticide-free farming? Sharing needs and knowledge promotes Integrated Pest Management.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  8. Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers-a green route to manage the European grapevine moth?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eckehard G BrockerhoffScion, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand.
David M Suckling
Mark Kimberley
Brian Richardson
Graham Coker
Stefan Gous
Jessica L Kerr
David M Cowan
David R Lance
Tara Strand
Aijun Zhang
Scion · NZUnited States Department of Agriculture · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USPlant & Food Research · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions can cause major ecological and economic impacts. During the early stages of invasions, eradication is desirable but tactics are lacking that are both effective and have minimal non-target effects. Mating disruption, which may meet these criteria, was initially chosen to respond to the incursion of light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana (LBAM; Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in California. The large size and limited accessibility of the infested area favored aerial application. Moth sex pheromone formulations for potential use in California or elsewhere were tested in a pine forest in New Zealand where LBAM is abundant. Formulations were applied by helicopter at a target rate of 40 g pheromone per ha. Trap catch before and after application was used to assess the efficacy and longevity of formulations, in comparison with plots treated with ground-applied pheromone dispensers and untreated control plots. Traps placed at different heights showed LBAM was abundant in the upper canopy of tall trees, which complicates control attempts. A wax formulation and polyethylene dispensers were most effective and provided trap shut-down near ground level for 10 weeks. Only the wax formulation was effective in the upper canopy. As the pheromone blend contained a behavioral antagonist for LBAM, 'false trail following' could be ruled out as a mechanism explaining trap shutdown. Therefore, 'sensory impairment' and 'masking of females' are the main modes of operation. Mating disruption enhances Allee effects which contribute to negative growth of small populations and, therefore, it is highly suitable for area-wide control and eradication of biological invaders.

Indexed as

AnimalsInsect ControlMothsNew ZealandPest Control, BiologicalSex AttractantsSexual Behavior, AnimalSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID22937092
PMCPMC3427152
OpenAlexW2039546460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.