ArticlePloS one2012
Strand-specific RNA-seq reveals ordered patterns of sense and antisense transcription in Bacillus anthracis.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial Transcription Factors Bind to Coding Regions and Regulate Internal Cryptic Promoters.mBio · 2022Article
- Recommendations for bacterial ribosome profiling experiments based on bioinformatic evaluation of published data.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- covRNA: discovering covariate associations in large-scale gene expression data.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- Initial Transcriptomic Response and Adaption ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Widespread antisense transcription of Populus genome under drought.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2018Article
- A Standard Method To Inactivate Bacillus anthracis Spores to Sterility via Gamma Irradiation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2018Article
- Article
- On the study of microbial transcriptomes using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016Review
- Assessment of individual differences in the rat nucleus accumbens transcriptome following taste-heroin extended access.Brain research bulletin · 2016Article
- Quantitative bacterial transcriptomics with RNA-seq.Current opinion in microbiology · 2015Review
- Strand-specific community RNA-seq reveals prevalent and dynamic antisense transcription in human gut microbiota.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Global transcriptional start site mapping using differential RNA sequencing reveals novel antisense RNAs in Escherichia coli.Journal of bacteriology · 2015Article
- Unprecedented high-resolution view of bacterial operon architecture revealed by RNA sequencing.mBio · 2014Article
- Integrated detection of natural antisense transcripts using strand-specific RNA sequencing data.Genome research · 2013Article
- Strand-Specific RNA-Seq Provides Greater Resolution of Transcriptome Profiling.Current genomics · 2013Article
- Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough genome-wide transcriptional analysis has been used for many years to study bacterial gene expression, many aspects of the bacterial transcriptome remain undefined. One example is antisense transcription, which has been observed in a number of bacteria, though the function of antisense transcripts, and their distribution across the bacterial genome, is still unclear. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsSingle-stranded RNA-seq results revealed a widespread and non-random pattern of antisense transcription covering more than two thirds of the B. anthracis genome. Our analysis revealed a variety of antisense structural patterns, suggesting multiple mechanisms of antisense transcription. The data revealed several instances of sense and antisense expression changes in different growth conditions, suggesting that antisense transcription may play a role in the ways in which B. anthracis responds to its environment. Significantly, genome-wide antisense expression occurred at consistently higher levels on the lagging strand, while the leading strand showed very little antisense activity. Intrasample gene expression comparisons revealed a gene dosage effect in all growth conditions, where genes farthest from the origin showed the lowest overall range of expression for both sense and antisense directed transcription. Additionally, transcription from both strands was verified using a novel strand-specific assay. The variety of structural patterns we observed in antisense transcription suggests multiple mechanisms for this phenomenon, suggesting that some antisense transcription may play a role in regulating the expression of key genes, while some may be due to chromosome replication dynamics and transcriptional noise. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Although the variety of structural patterns we observed in antisense transcription suggest multiple mechanisms for antisense expression, our data also clearly indicate that antisense transcription may play a genome-wide role in regulating the expression of key genes in Bacillus species. This study illustrates the surprising complexity of prokaryotic RNA abundance for both strands of a bacterial chromosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.