ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2013
Combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin for metastatic urothelial carcinomas in patients with high renal insufficiency.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03101995 (A Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Potential of Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy With Gemcitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced Carcinoma of Cervix and Renal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Potential of Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy With Gemcitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced Carcinoma of Cervix and Renal Disease
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis was a retrospective study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combined chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GCa) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinomas (UCs) with special regard to patients with highly impaired renal function.
methodsEleven patients whose creatinine clearance was 30 ml/min or under and who had been diagnosed with metastatic UC were treated with GCa. The patient cohort comprised 4 males and 7 females, with a median age of 74 (range 67-84) years. The median follow-up was 19 (range 1-58) months.
resultsFive of the 11 patients (45%) showed an objective response, with 2 achieving a clinically complete response and 3 a partial response with GCa. The grade 3/4 toxicity of the regimen was primarily hematological, including anemia (55%), neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (45%). Four patients (36%) could not complete the treatment in total. Grade 3 pneumonitis was found in one patient, and the treatment was terminated. Grade 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in the patient on hemodialysis, and the patient was forced to discontinue the chemotherapy. Another 2 patients also called off the treatment due to a pulmonary adverse event and an elevation of serum creatinine, respectively.
conclusionsGCa appears to be effective for the treatment of metastatic UCs in patients with impaired renal function, but it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of severe adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.