Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22936407›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2012

Understanding the oral mucosal absorption and resulting clinical pharmacokinetics of asenapine.

Jeremy A Bartlett, Kees van der Voort Maarschalk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trip killers: Addressing a critical knowledge gap in psychedelic research.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Bioavailability of CHF6563, an Ethanol-Free, Sublingual Neonatal Buprenorphine Formulation: A Bridging Study Conducted in Adults.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chewing Gums as a Drug Delivery Approach for Oral Health.International journal of dentistry · 2022
    Review
  17. A novel amorphous solid dispersion based on drug-polymer complexation.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy A BartlettPharmaceutical Development, Worldwide Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA. jeremy.a.bartlett@pfizer.com
Kees van der Voort Maarschalk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Absorption of drugs from the oral cavity into the mucosal tissues is typically a fast event. Dissolved drugs partition into the mucosal membranes and within minutes will reach equilibrium with drug in solution in the oral cavity. However, this does not always equate to rapid drug appearance in the systemic circulation. This has been attributed to slow partitioning out of the mucosal tissues and into the systemic circulation. Based on information from literature, physicochemical properties of asenapine, and clinical data, we conclude that for sublingually administered asenapine, the exposure is primarily a function of rapid partitioning into the mucosal membranes. This is followed by slow partitioning out of the mucosal tissues and into the systemic circulation, leading to a T (max) value of about 1 h. The bioavailability of asenapine at doses below the saturation solubility in the mouth does not change and is controlled primarily by mass transport equilibrium. At doses above the saturation solubility, the bioavailability becomes more dependent not only on the distribution equilibrium but also on contact time in the mouth because additional variables (e.g. dissolution rate of the drug) need to be accounted for. These explanations are consistent with oral cavity absorption models from the literature and can be used to accurately describe the clinical data for asenapine.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAdministration, SublingualAntipsychotic AgentsBiological AvailabilityDibenzocycloheptenesHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsModels, BiologicalMouth MucosaMucous MembraneSolubilityWaterAntipsychotic AgentsasenapineDibenzocycloheptenesHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsWater

Identifiers

PMID22936407
PMCPMC3513449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.