Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22936249›Full record

ArticleGenome research2013

A second-generation assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome provides new insights into patterns of lineage-specific divergence.

Tina T Hu, Michael B Eisen, Kevin R Thornton, Peter Andolfatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene age shapes functional and evolutionary properties of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Dichotomous transcriptome divergence at the cell-type level between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gene model for the ortholog ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tina T HuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA. tthu@princeton.edu
Michael B Eisen
Kevin R Thornton
Peter Andolfatto

Funding

Adaptive evolution of non coding DNA and gene expression divergence in DrosophilaR01GM083228 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDOLFATTO, PETER · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Population genetics of gene duplications and copy-number variants in the DrosophiR01GM085183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083228NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM083228NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM085183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We create a new assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome using 142 million paired short-read sequences and previously published data for strain w(501). Our assembly represents a higher-quality genomic sequence with greater coverage, fewer misassemblies, and, by several indexes, fewer sequence errors. Evolutionary analysis of this genome reference sequence reveals interesting patterns of lineage-specific divergence that are different from those previously reported. Specifically, we find that Drosophila melanogaster evolves faster than D. simulans at all annotated classes of sites, including putatively neutrally evolving sites found in minimal introns. While this may be partly explained by a higher mutation rate in D. melanogaster, we also find significant heterogeneity in rates of evolution across classes of sites, consistent with historical differences in the effective population size for the two species. Also contrary to previous findings, we find that the X chromosome is evolving significantly faster than autosomes for nonsynonymous and most noncoding DNA sites and significantly slower for synonymous sites. The absence of a X/A difference for putatively neutral sites and the robustness of the pattern to Gene Ontology and sex-biased expression suggest that partly recessive beneficial mutations may comprise a substantial fraction of noncoding DNA divergence observed between species. Our results have more general implications for the interpretation of evolutionary analyses of genomes of different quality.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, InsectAnimalsChromosomes, InsectContig MappingDrosophilaIntronsMutation RatePhylogenyPopulationX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID22936249
PMCPMC3530686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.