ArticleNature methods2012
Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus.
Article in Nature methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic literature review of the 'commercialisation effect' on public attitudes towards biobank and genomic data repositories.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Guidelines for Biobanking of Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Related Cell Types: Report of the Biobanking Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Guideline
- Japanese attitudes toward cell donation in human brain organoid research: many oppose broad consent.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Ethical, Legal, and Practical Concerns Surrounding the Implemention of New Forms of Consent for Health Data Research: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequencing in (recurrent) glioblastoma: challenges related to informed consent procedures and data sharing.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Review
- Broad consent for biobank research in South Africa - Towards an enabling ethico-legal framework.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2024Article
- Commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance: a mixed methods investigation to identify a trusted Australian genomics repository.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based donor permission extraction from informed consent documents.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data.Journal of medical ethics · 2023Article
- Better governance starts with better words: why responsible human tissue research demands a change of language.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- The difficulties of broad data sharing in genomic medicine: Empirical evidence from diverse participants in prenatal and pediatric clinical genomics research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- When Not to Ask: A Defense of Choice-Masking Nudges in Medical Research.Journal of health care law & policy · 2022Article
- Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2020Article
- Legacy samples in Finnish biobanks: social and legal issues related to the transfer of old sample collections into biobanks.Human genetics · 2019Article
- Broad consent for biobanks is best - provided it is also deep.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2019Article
- The Experience of Establishing Data Sharing & Linkage Platforms for Administrative, Research and Community-Service Data.International journal of population data science · 2019Article
- Jordanians' Perspectives On Open Consent In Biomedical Research.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2019Article
- Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22936169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.