Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22936035›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2013

Improving T cell responses to modified peptides in tumor vaccines.

Jonathan D Buhrman, Jill E Slansky

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structurally silent peptide anchor modifications allosterically modulate T cell recognition in a receptor-dependent manner.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. High-affinity oligoclonal TCRs define effective adoptive T cell therapy targeting mutant KRAS-G12D.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Breaking tolerance with engineered class I antigen-presenting molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Targeting Angiogenesis With Peptide Vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Metabolic Adaptation of Human CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan D BuhrmanIntegrated Department of Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Jill E Slansky
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Mouses Model for Ag.Specific Immunotherapy of CancerR01CA109560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA109560NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune recognition and elimination of cancerous cells is the primary goal of cancer immunotherapy. However, obstacles including immune tolerance and tumor-induced immunosuppression often limit beneficial immune responses. Vaccination is one proposed intervention that may help to overcome these issues and is an active area of study in cancer immunotherapy. Immunizing with tumor antigenic peptides is a promising, straight-forward vaccine strategy hypothesized to boost preexisting antitumor immunity. However, tumor antigens are often weak T cell agonists, attributable to several mechanisms, including immune self-tolerance and poor immunogenicity of self-derived tumor peptides. One strategy for overcoming these mechanisms is vaccination with mimotopes, or peptide mimics of tumor antigens, which alter the antigen presentation and/or T cell activation to increase the expansion of tumor-specific T cells. Evaluation of mimotope vaccine strategies has revealed that even subtle alterations in peptide sequence can dramatically alter antigen presentation and T cell receptor recognition. Most of this research has been performed using T cell clones, which may not be accurate representations of the naturally occurring antitumor response. The relationship between clones generated after mimotope vaccination and the polyclonal T cell repertoire is unclear. Our work with mimotopes in a mouse model of colon carcinoma has revealed important insights into these issues. We propose that the identification of mimotopes based on stimulation of the naturally responding T cell repertoire will dramatically improve the efficacy of mimotope vaccination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansNeoplasmsVaccines, SubunitAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID22936035
PMCPMC3952016
OpenAlexW2008472656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.