Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22935885›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2013

Phagocytes mediate targeting of iron oxide nanoparticles to tumors for cancer therapy.

Seiko Toraya-Brown, Mee Rie Sheen, Jason R Baird, Stephen Barry, Eugene Demidenko, Mary Jo Turk, P Jack Hoopes, Jose R Conejo-Garcia, Steven Fiering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Clinical magnetic hyperthermia requires integrated magnetic particle imaging.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Stimulating antitumor immunity with nanoparticles.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seiko Toraya-BrownDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Mee Rie Sheen
Jason R Baird
Stephen Barry
Eugene Demidenko
Mary Jo Turk
P Jack Hoopes
Jose R Conejo-Garcia
Steven Fiering

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Toxicology, Pathology and Biodistribution Core (TPB Core)U54CA151662 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BAKER, IAN · 2010 to 2014
$11.6M
Vascular Leukocytes Influence the Tumor MicroenvironmentR01CA124515 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Jose R Conejo-Garcia · 2007 to 2026
$7.1M
Initiation and Evolution of the Ovarian Cancer MicroenvironmentR01CA157664 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI CONEJO-GARCIA, JOSE R · 2011 to 2020
$3.8M
Mechanisms of concomitant tumor immunity and autoimmunityR01CA120777 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TURK, MARY JO · 2006 to 2016
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS 1 U54 CA151662-01NCI NIH HHS CA157664NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120777NCI NIH HHS R01 CA124515NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157664NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has great potential to produce novel therapeutic strategies that target malignant cells through the ability of nanoparticles to get access to and be ingested by living cells. However its specificity for accumulation in tumors, which is the key factor that determines its efficacy, has always been a challenge. Here we tested a novel strategy to target and treat ovarian cancer, a representative peritoneal cancer, using iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) and an alternating magnetic field (AMF). Peritoneal tumors in general are directly accessible to nanoparticles administered intraperitoneally (IP), as opposed to the more commonly attempted intravenous (IV) administration. In addition, tumor-associated immunosuppressive phagocytes, a predominant cell population in the tumor microenvironment of almost all solid tumors, and cells that are critical for tumor progression, are constantly recruited to the tumor, and therefore could possibly function to bring nanoparticles to tumors. Here we demonstrate that tumor-associated peritoneal phagocytes ingest and carry IONPs specifically to tumors and that these specifically delivered nanoparticles can damage tumor cells after IONP-mediated hyperthermia generated by AMF. This illustrates therapeutic possibilities of intraperitoneal (IP) injection of nanoparticles and subsequent ingestion by tumor-associated phagocytes, to directly impact tumors or stimulate antitumor immune responses. This approach could use IONPs combined with AMF as done here, or other nanoparticles with cytotoxic potential. Overall, the data presented here support IP injection of nanoparticles to utilize peritoneal phagocytes as a delivery vehicle in association with IONP-mediated hyperthermia as therapeutic strategies for ovarian and other peritoneal cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorFemaleHyperthermia, InducedMagnetic Field TherapyMagnetite NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOvarian NeoplasmsPhagocytesTreatment OutcomeMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID22935885
PMCPMC3524361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.