Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22935717›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2012

Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.

Marsha Michie, R Jean Cadigan, Gail Henderson, Laura M Beskow

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marsha MichieCenter for Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
R Jean Cadigan
Gail Henderson
Laura M Beskow
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Center for Genomics and SocietyP50HG004488 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2007 to 2017
$12.6M
Ethical Approaches to Genotype-Driven Research RecruitmentRC1HG005787 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BESKOW, LAURA M. · 2009 to 2010
$850k
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG004488NHGRI NIH HHS RC1 HG005787NHGRI NIH HHS RC1HG005787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenotype-driven research recruitment complicates traditional study roles and may leave those recruited worried about unwelcome surprises from their DNA. This study investigated the ways that individuals experience genotype-driven recruitment, and conceptualize their roles as research participants.

methodsIndividual interviews were conducted with the participants of a genotype-driven study on cystic fibrosis. The eligibility criteria included the presence of one of two genetic variants. We interviewed 24 of these participants: 9 had cystic fibrosis and 15 had been selected from a biobank as "healthy volunteers."

resultsParticipants with cystic fibrosis expressed no concerns about the eligibility criteria and saw themselves as part of a close-knit research community. However, biobank participants were unsure about why they had been selected and how they should think about themselves relative to the study. They sometimes reacted with anxiety to genetic information that they perceived to connect them with cystic fibrosis.

conclusionBeing recruited for a study on the basis of one's genotype may raise uncertainties about the meaning and implications of the genotypic information. People without the disease under study may require especially clear and detailed explanations of what researchers already know about their genetic makeup, in terms of future risk for themselves or their children.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesGenotypePatient SelectionAdultCystic FibrosisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch SubjectsSelf ConceptTransforming Growth Factor beta1Young AdultTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID22935717
PMCPMC3578310
OpenAlexW2012352490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.