Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22935448›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2012

Development of chemical inhibitors of the SARS coronavirus: viral helicase as a potential target.

Young-Sam Keum, Yong-Joo Jeong

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A potent virucidal activity of functionalized TiOApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Arabian journal of chemistry · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Young-Sam KeumCollege of Pharmacy, Dongguk University, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Joo Jeong
Dongguk University · KRKookmin University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was the first pandemic in the 21st century to claim more than 700 lives worldwide. However, effective anti-SARS vaccines or medications are currently unavailable despite being desperately needed to adequately prepare for a possible SARS outbreak. SARS is caused by a novel coronavirus, and one of its components, a viral helicase, is emerging as a promising target for the development of chemical SARS inhibitors. In the following review, we describe the characterization, family classification, and kinetic movement mechanisms of the SARS coronavirus (SCV) helicase-nsP13. We also discuss the recent progress in the identification of novel chemical inhibitors of nsP13 in the context of our recent discovery of the strong inhibition of the SARS helicase by natural flavonoids, myricetin and scutellarein. These compounds will serve as important resources for the future development of anti-SARS medications.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsApigeninDNA HelicasesDNA, ViralFlavonoidsHumansHydrolysisMethyltransferasesNucleoside-TriphosphataseRNA HelicasesSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusViral Nonstructural ProteinsAntiviral AgentsApigeninDNA HelicasesDNA, ViralFlavonoidsMethyltransferasesmyricetinNsp13 protein, SARS-CoVNucleoside-TriphosphataseRNA HelicasesscutellareinViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22935448
PMCPMC7092843
OpenAlexW2090577155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.