ArticleMutation research
Harnessing genomics to identify environmental determinants of heritable disease.
Article in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mutagenesis moonshot: The propitious beginnings of the environmental mutagenesis and genomics society.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2020Review
- Susceptibility Variations in Air Pollution Health Effects: Incorporating Neuroendocrine Activation.Toxicologic pathology · 2019Article
- Genetic Effect of Chemotherapy Exposure in Children of Testicular Cancer Survivors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016Article
- Structural variation mutagenesis of the human genome: Impact on disease and evolution.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2015Review
- Personalized biochemistry and biophysics.Biochemistry · 2015Article
- Paternal lifestyle as a potential source of germline mutations transmitted to offspring.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 18 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies can now be used to directly measure heritable de novo DNA sequence mutations in humans. However, these techniques have not been used to examine environmental factors that induce such mutations and their associated diseases. To address this issue, a working group on environmentally induced germline mutation analysis (ENIGMA) met in October 2011 to propose the necessary foundational studies, which include sequencing of parent-offspring trios from highly exposed human populations, and controlled dose-response experiments in animals. These studies will establish background levels of variability in germline mutation rates and identify environmental agents that influence these rates and heritable disease. Guidance for the types of exposures to examine come from rodent studies that have identified agents such as cancer chemotherapeutic drugs, ionizing radiation, cigarette smoke, and air pollution as germ-cell mutagens. Research is urgently needed to establish the health consequences of parental exposures on subsequent generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.