Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22935133›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2012

PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands.

Stephanie van Bragt, Lisette van den Bemt, Bart Thoonen, Chris van Weel, Peter Merkus, Tjard Schermer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01109745 (Effectiveness of the Paediatric Electronic Quality of Life Instrument for Childhood Asthma in the Netherlands), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01109745 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of the Paediatric Electronic Quality of Life Instrument for Childhood Asthma in the Netherlands (Pelican) in Medical Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2011 to 2014Enrolled120ConditionsAsthmaArmsPELICAN Primary Care, PELICAN Secondary Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Shared decision-making for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Validity, reliability and discriminative capacity of an electronic quality of life instrument (Pelican) for childhood asthma in the Netherlands.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie van BragtDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. s.vanbragt@elg.umcn.nl
Lisette van den Bemt
Bart Thoonen
Chris van Weel
Peter Merkus
Tjard Schermer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is one of the major chronic health problems in children in the Netherlands. The Pelican is a paediatric asthma-related quality of life instrument for children with asthma from 6-11 years old, which is suitable for clinical practice in primary and specialized care. Based on this instrument, we developed a self-management treatment to improve asthma-related quality of life. The Pelican intervention will be investigated in different health care settings. Results of intervention studies are often extrapolated to other health care settings than originally investigated. Because of differences in organization, disease severity, patient characteristics and care provision between health care settings, extrapolating research results could lead to unnecessary health costs without the desired health care achievements. Therefore, interventions have to be investigated in different health care settings when possible. This study is an example of an intervention study in different health care settings. In this article, we will present the study protocol of the Pelican study in primary and specialized care. METHOD/

designThis study consists of two randomized controlled trials to assess the effectiveness of the Pelican intervention in primary and specialized care. The trial in primary care is a multilevel design with 170 children with asthma in 16 general practices. All children in one general practices are allocated to the same treatment group. The trial in specialized care is a multicentre trial with 100 children with asthma. Children in one outpatient clinic are randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care group. In both trials, children will visit the care provider four times during a follow-up of nine months. This study is registered and ethically approved. DISCUSSION: This article describes the study protocol of the Pelican study in different health care settings. If the Pelican intervention proves to be effective and efficient, implementation in primary and specialized care for paediatric asthma in the Netherlands will be recommended.

trial registrationThis study is registered by clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01109745).

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeSecondary Health CareAsthmaChildClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisFollow-Up StudiesHumansNetherlandsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionSample SizeSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22935133
PMCPMC3512535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.