Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2293500›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine

Numerous growth factors can influence in vitro megakaryocytopoiesis.

R Hoffman, R Briddell, E Bruno

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R HoffmanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
R Briddell
E Bruno
Indiana University School of Medicine

Funding

REGULATION OF HEMATOPOIESIS IN CANCERR01CA034841 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI HOFFMAN, RONALD · 1985 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-34841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At least two classes of human megakaryocyte progenitor cells have been identified: the burst-forming unit megakaryocyte (BFU-MK) and the colony-forming unit megakaryocyte (CFU-MK). The BFU-MK is the most primitive progenitor cell committed to the megakaryocytic lineage. The CFU-MK appears to be a more differentiated megakaryocyte progenitor cell and is thought to be ultimately a descendant of the BFU-MK. A number of recombinant cytokines have recently been shown to be able to promote megakaryocyte colony formation in vitro. Recombinant GM-CSF and IL-3, in particular, have the ability to promote both CFU-MK- and BFU-MK-derived colony stimulatory formation. The activities of these two cytokines on in vitro megakaryocytopoiesis are also additive. Recent results of clinical trials in both primates and humans, in which these glycoproteins were administered in vivo, suggest that these cytokines, both alone and in combination, can enhance in vivo thrombopoiesis and therefore may be potentially useful in the treatment of thrombocytopenic disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug SynergismGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorGrowth SubstancesHumansInterleukin-1Interleukin-3Interleukin-6In Vitro TechniquesMegakaryocytesRecombinant ProteinsStem CellsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorGrowth SubstancesInterleukin-1Interleukin-3Interleukin-6Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID2293500
PMCPMC2589366
OpenAlexW2410929661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.