Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22934104›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2012

Acute coronary syndromes: an old age problem.

Alexander D Simms, Philip D Batin, John Kurian, Nigel Durham, Christopher P Gale

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of serious bleeding signals during concomitant use of clopidogrel and hypnotic drugs.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Trajectories of perceived social support in acute coronary syndrome.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Frailty and acute coronary syndrome: A structured literature review.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander D SimmsCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Level 8, Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, West Yorkshire, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Philip D Batin
John Kurian
Nigel Durham
Christopher P Gale
University of Leeds · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBYork Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing population in older age will lead to greater numbers of them presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This has implications on global healthcare resources and necessitates better management and selection for evidenced-based therapies. The elderly are a high risk group with more significant treatment benefits than younger ACS. Nevertheless, age related inequalities in ACS care are recognised and persist. This discrepancy in care, to some extent, is explained by the higher frequency of atypical and delayed presentations in the elderly, and less diagnostic electrocardiograms at presentation, potentiating a delay in ACS diagnosis. Under estimation of mortality risk in the elderly due to limited consideration for physiological frailty, co-morbidity, cognitive/psychological impairment and physical disability, less input by cardiology specialists and lack of randomised, controlled trials data to guide management in the elderly may further confound the inequality of care. While these inequalities exist, there remains a substantial opportunity to improve age related ACS outcomes. The selection of elderly patients for specific therapies and medication regimens are unanswered. There is a growing need for randomised, controlled trial data to be more representative of the population and enroll those of advanced age with co-morbidity. A lack of reporting of adverse events, such as renal impairment post coronary angiography, in the elderly further limit risk benefit decisions. Substantial improvements in care of elderly ACS patients are required and should be advocated. Ultimately, these improvements are likely to lead to better outcomes post ACS. However, the improvement in outcome is not infinite and will be limited by non-modifiable factors of age-related risk.

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromesElderly patientsEvidenced-based treatmentsInequalities of care

Identifiers

PMID22934104
PMCPMC3419819
OpenAlexW1532567046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.