ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2012
Acute coronary syndromes: an old age problem.
Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioequivalence Study Comparing Fixed-Dose Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin with Coadministration of Individual Formulations in Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.Advances in therapy · 2020Trial
- Effectiveness of the cardiac-diabetes transcare program: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2017Trial
- Evaluation of serious bleeding signals during concomitant use of clopidogrel and hypnotic drugs.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021Article
- Challenges in the management of older patients with acute coronary syndromes in the COVID-19 pandemic.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2020Review
- Trajectories of perceived social support in acute coronary syndrome.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- The relationship between frailty syndrome and quality of life in older patients following acute coronary syndrome.Clinical interventions in aging · 2019Observational
- Frailty and acute coronary syndrome: A structured literature review.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2018Review
- New challenges of geriatric cardiology: from clinical to preclinical research.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2017Article
- Inequalities in care in patients with acute myocardial infarction.World journal of cardiology · 2015Review
- A Review of Current Diagnosis, Investigation, and Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Elderly Patients.Cardiology and therapy · 2015Article
- Impact of frailty on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.Open heartArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing population in older age will lead to greater numbers of them presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This has implications on global healthcare resources and necessitates better management and selection for evidenced-based therapies. The elderly are a high risk group with more significant treatment benefits than younger ACS. Nevertheless, age related inequalities in ACS care are recognised and persist. This discrepancy in care, to some extent, is explained by the higher frequency of atypical and delayed presentations in the elderly, and less diagnostic electrocardiograms at presentation, potentiating a delay in ACS diagnosis. Under estimation of mortality risk in the elderly due to limited consideration for physiological frailty, co-morbidity, cognitive/psychological impairment and physical disability, less input by cardiology specialists and lack of randomised, controlled trials data to guide management in the elderly may further confound the inequality of care. While these inequalities exist, there remains a substantial opportunity to improve age related ACS outcomes. The selection of elderly patients for specific therapies and medication regimens are unanswered. There is a growing need for randomised, controlled trial data to be more representative of the population and enroll those of advanced age with co-morbidity. A lack of reporting of adverse events, such as renal impairment post coronary angiography, in the elderly further limit risk benefit decisions. Substantial improvements in care of elderly ACS patients are required and should be advocated. Ultimately, these improvements are likely to lead to better outcomes post ACS. However, the improvement in outcome is not infinite and will be limited by non-modifiable factors of age-related risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.