Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22933800›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

The selectivity of task-dependent attention varies with surrounding context.

Yee-Joon Kim, Preeti Verghese

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Attention to Multiple Objects Facilitates Their Integration in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Oscillatory recruitment of bilateral visual cortex during spatial attention to competing rhythmic inputs.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.Journal of neurophysiology · 2013
    Article
  16. Attention selects informative neural populations in human V1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yee-Joon KimSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. joon@ski.org
Preeti Verghese

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is thought to operate by enhancing the target of interest and suppressing the surroundings. We hypothesized that the spatial profile of attention depends on the surround's relationship to the target. Using high-density electroencephalographic measurements, we examined the spatial profile of attention to a grating target surrounded by an annular grating that was either coextensive with the target (unsegmented) or appeared segmented from it due to a gap or phase offset. We directly probed the spread of attention from the central target into the surround by flickering the surround and monitoring frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials. Observers were required to detect a contrast increment that occurred only on the target. Successful detection of the increment required selecting the target and suppressing the surround, particularly when the target did not readily segment from the surround. The profile of attention was investigated in five visual regions of interest (ROIs) (V1, V4, V3A, lateral occipital complex, and human middle temporal area), mapped in a separate anatomical magnetic resonance imaging scan. We found that in most ROIs, attention to the target generated smaller responses from the surrounding annulus when it was contiguous compared with when it was clearly segmented. This result shows that the profile of attention depends on task demands and on surrounding context; attention is tightly focused when the target region needs to be isolated but loosely focused when the target region is clearly segmented.

Indexed as

AttentionFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22933800
PMCPMC6621517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.