Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22933726›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012

Signal-to-noise ratio in the membrane potential of the owl's auditory coincidence detectors.

Go Ashida, Kazuo Funabiki, Paula T Kuokkanen, Richard Kempter, Catherine E Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Go AshidaDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA. ashida@umd.edu
Kazuo Funabiki
Paula T Kuokkanen
Richard Kempter
Catherine E Carr

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING SOUND LOCALIZATIONR01DC000436 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 1994 to 2017
$6.1M
CORE--IMAGINGP30DC004664 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOSS, CYNTHIA F · 2002 to 2012
$3.5M
CELLULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING SOUND LOCALIZATIONR29DC000436 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 1989 to 1992
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00436NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004664NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC04664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owls use interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate a sound source. They compute ITD in a specialized neural circuit that consists of axonal delay lines from the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and coincidence detectors in the nucleus laminaris (NL). Recent physiological recordings have shown that tonal stimuli induce oscillatory membrane potentials in NL neurons (Funabiki K, Ashida G, Konishi M. J Neurosci 31: 15245-15256, 2011). The amplitude of these oscillations varies with ITD and is strongly correlated to the firing rate. The oscillation, termed the sound analog potential, has the same frequency as the stimulus tone and is presumed to originate from phase-locked synaptic inputs from NM fibers. To investigate how these oscillatory membrane potentials are generated, we applied recently developed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis techniques (Kuokkanen PT, Wagner H, Ashida G, Carr CE, Kempter R. J Neurophysiol 104: 2274-2290, 2010) to the intracellular waveforms obtained in vivo. Our theoretical prediction of the band-limited SNRs agreed with experimental data for mid- to high-frequency (>2 kHz) NL neurons. For low-frequency (≤2 kHz) NL neurons, however, measured SNRs were lower than theoretical predictions. These results suggest that the number of independent NM fibers converging onto each NL neuron and/or the population-averaged degree of phase-locking of the NM fibers could be significantly smaller in the low-frequency NL region than estimated for higher best-frequency NL.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsSound LocalizationAnimalsCochlear NucleusModels, NeurologicalNerve FibersNeuronsSignal-To-Noise RatioStrigiformes

Identifiers

PMID22933726
PMCPMC3545117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.