ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012
Evaluation of methods for identification and determination of the taxonomic status of strains belonging to the Streptococcus porcinus-Streptococcus pseudoporcinus complex isolated from animal, human, and dairy sources.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Invasive Infections Caused by Streptococcus pseudoporcinus: A Two-Case Series and Review of the Literature.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Case report: Multidrug-resistantFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Trial Proteomic Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of the Protein Matrix of Submandibular Sialoliths.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Fatal Streptococcus pseudoporcinus disseminated infection in decompensated liver cirrhosis: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
- Isolation and characteristics of multi-drug resistant Streptococcus porcinus from the vaginal secretions of sow with endometritis.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Bacteremia because of Streptococcus pseudoporcinus in a Syphilis-HIV co-infected patient: A case report.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- First report of infective endocarditis caused byNew microbes and new infections · 2020Article
- Suggested Modifications To Improve the Sensitivity and Specificity of the 2010 CDC-Recommended RoutineJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- A Case of Maternal Sepsis and Fetal Demise Associated withCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Article
- A case of leg cellulitis caused by multidrug-resistantIntractable & rare diseases research · 2018Article
- Antibiotic susceptibility, cytotoxicity, and protease activity of viridans group streptococci causing endophthalmitis.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Brief Case: Too Beta To Be a "B".Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Recognition of Streptococcus pseudoporcinus Colonization in Women as a Consequence of Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Group B Streptococcus Identification.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ninety-seven animal, human, and dairy Streptococcus porcinus or Streptococcus pseudoporcinus isolates in the CDC Streptococcus strain collection were evaluated on the basis of DNA-DNA reassociation, 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequencing, conventional biochemical and Rapid ID 32 Strep identification methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine their taxonomic status, characteristics for species differentiation, antimicrobial susceptibility, and relevance of clinical source. Nineteen of the 97 isolates (1 human, 18 swine) were identified as S. porcinus. The remaining 72 human isolates and 6 dairy isolates were identified as S. pseudoporcinus. The use of 16S rRNA or rpoB gene sequencing was required to differentiate S. porcinus from S. pseudoporcinus. The human and dairy S. pseudoporcinus isolates were biochemically distinct from each other as well as distinct by 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequencing. Therefore, we propose the subspecies denominations S. pseudoporcinus subsp. hominis subsp. nov. for the human isolates and S. pseudoporcinus subsp. lactis subsp. nov. for the dairy isolates. Most strains were susceptible to the antimicrobials tested, with the exception of tetracycline. Two strains of each species were also resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin and carried the erm(A) (S. pseudoporcinus) or the erm(B) (S. porcinus) gene. S. porcinus was identified from a single human isolate recovered from a wound in an abattoir worker. S. pseudoporcinus was primarily isolated from the genitourinary tract of women but was also associated with blood, placental, and wound infections. Isolates reacting with group B antiserum and demonstrating wide beta-hemolysis should be suspected of being S. pseudoporcinus and not S. agalactiae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.