Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22933242›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2012

A histological comparison of the original and regenerated tail in the green anole, Anolis carolinensis.

Rebecca E Fisher, Lauren A Geiger, Laura K Stroik, Elizabeth D Hutchins, Rajani M George, Dale F Denardo, Kenro Kusumi, J Alan Rawls, Jeanne Wilson-Rawls

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The vertebrate tail: a gene playground for evolution.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca E FisherDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Lauren A Geiger
Laura K Stroik
Elizabeth D Hutchins
Rajani M George
Dale F Denardo
Kenro Kusumi
J Alan Rawls
Jeanne Wilson-Rawls
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Developing the Anolis Lizard as a Model of Musculoskeletal RegenerationR21RR031305 · NCRR · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUSUMI, KENRO · 2010 to 2011
$413k
NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR031305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a histological comparison of the mature regenerated and original tail of the lizard Anolis carolinensis. These data will provide a framework for future studies of this emerging model organism whose genome was recently published. This study demonstrated that the cartilage skeleton of the regenerated tail enclosed a spinal cord with an ependymal core, but there was no evidence that dorsal root ganglia or peripheral nerves are regenerated. The cartilage tube contained foramina that allowed the vasculature to cross, but was otherwise a rigid structure. The original tail has muscle groups arranged in quadrants in a regular pattern that attach to the vertebral column. The regenerated tail has irregular muscle bundles of variable number that form unusual attachments to each other and to the cartilage tube. Furthermore, the data show that there was increased connective tissue within the muscle bundles. Implications for functionality of the regenerated tail and for future biomechanical studies are discussed.

Indexed as

LizardsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCartilageFemaleMaleRegenerationTail

Identifiers

PMID22933242
PMCPMC4389898
OpenAlexW2069111221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.