Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22933131›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012

Hepatitis B virus management to prevent reactivation after chemotherapy: a review.

Jessica P Hwang, John M Vierling, Andrew D Zelenetz, Susan C Lackey, Rohit Loomba

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cross-sectional study of hepatitis B virus infection in female breast cancer patients in China for the first time diagnosed.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Risk factors forWorld journal of clinical cases · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Infections in Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors: A Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica P HwangThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. jphwang@mdanderson.org
John M Vierling
Andrew D Zelenetz
Susan C Lackey
Rohit Loomba
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASEK23DK090303 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LOOMBA, ROHIT · 2011 to 2014
$721k
HBV reactivation among cancer patients receiving chemotherapyK07CA132955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HWANG, JESSICA PARK · 2010 to 2014
$702k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA132955NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after chemotherapy can lead to liver failure and death. Conflicting recommendations regarding HBV screening in cancer patients awaiting chemotherapy mean that some patients at risk for HBV reactivation are not being identified and treated with prophylactic antiviral therapy.

methodsWe performed a narrative review of the existing evidence regarding screening for and management of HBV infection among patients with cancer using Ovid Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library.

resultsOur review showed inconsistencies in the definition and management strategies for HBV reactivation. The timeframe of reactivation is variable, and its molecular mechanisms are not clear. There are five effective antiviral agents that can be used as prophylaxis to prevent reactivation of HBV infection in cancer patients; however, the optimal drug and duration of therapy are unknown. Reactivation is more commonly reported in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving rituximab treatment, but reactivation can occur after other chemotherapies and in patients with solid tumors. Screening with all three screening tests-HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs-allows the most thorough interpretation of a patient's serologic profile and assessment of reactivation risk; however, decision-making and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies.

conclusionsPrevention of reactivation of HBV infection depends on identification of patients at risk and initiation of antiviral prophylaxis, but data to guide screening and treatment strategies are lacking. Additional research is necessary to accurately define and predict reactivation, identify best antiviral treatment strategies, and identify cost-effective HBV screening strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntiviral AgentsHepatitis BHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansMass ScreeningNeoplasmsRisk FactorsVirus ActivationAntineoplastic AgentsAntiviral AgentsHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22933131
PMCPMC3469760
OpenAlexW2086156241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.