Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22932909›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2013

Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

Dirk Rolf Bulian, Jürgen Knuth, Axel Sauerwald, Michael Alfred Ströhlein, Rolf Lefering, Jörg Ansorg, Markus Maria Heiss

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014
    Article
  7. Appendicopathy--a clinical and diagnostic dilemma.International journal of colorectal disease · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dirk Rolf BulianDepartment of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany. buliand@kliniken-koeln.de
Jürgen Knuth
Axel Sauerwald
Michael Alfred Ströhlein
Rolf Lefering
Jörg Ansorg
Markus Maria Heiss
Witten/Herdecke University · DEGerman Medical Association · DEKrankenhaus Köln-Holweide · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough appendectomies are frequently performed and new procedural techniques have emerged, no nationwide analysis exists after the cessation of the German quality control in 2004.

methodsOne thousand eight hundred seventy surgical hospitals in Germany were asked to answer questions anonymously concerning the size of the department, applied procedural techniques, various technical details, as well as the approach to the intraoperative finding of an inconspicuous appendix.

resultsWe received 643 questionnaires (34.4 %) for evaluation. Almost all hospitals (95.5 %) offer laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), 15.4 % offer single-port (SPA), and 2.2 % (hybrid-) NOTES technique (NA). LA is the standard procedure in 85.2 % of male and in 89.1 % for female patients. In an open procedure (OA), the appendix and mesoappendix are mostly ligated (93.8 and 91.5 %). A Veress needle and open access are employed equally for LA. In 66.6 % of LA, the appendix is divided using an Endo-GIA, the mesoappendix in 45.5 % with bipolar coagulation. Almost half of the hospitals routinely flush the site in OA and LA. In open surgery with an inconspicuous appendix but a pathological finding elsewhere in the abdomen, it is resected "en principe" in 64.7 % and in the absence of any pathological finding in 91.2 %. For laparoscopic procedures, the numbers are 54.8 and 88.4 %.

conclusionsMost German hospitals perform appendectomies laparoscopically regardless of patients' gender. Usage of an Endo-GIA is widely established. SPA has not gained much acceptance, nor is NA widely used yet. In the absence of any pathological findings in particular, the macroscopically inconspicuous appendix results in an appendectomy "en principe" in most German hospitals.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisFemaleGermanyHealth Care SurveysHumansLaparoscopyMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22932909
OpenAlexW2023222448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.