Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22931521›Full record

ReviewDrugs2012

New oral anticoagulants: a review of the literature with particular emphasis on patients with impaired renal function.

Birgitte Klindt Poulsen, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Steen Elkjaer Husted

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Challenges and Treatment for Stroke Prophylaxis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Mexico: A Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Monitoring anticoagulant therapy with new oral agents.World journal of methodology · 2015
    Review
  17. Use Patterns and Unlabeled Uses of Target-Specific Oral Anticoagulants: A Single-Center Experience.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2015
    Article
  18. New Oral Anticoagulants: How Do We Use Them Wisely?Current cardiology reports · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birgitte Klindt PoulsenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark. bkz@farm.au.dk
Erik Lerkevang Grove
Steen Elkjaer Husted
Aarhus University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital West Jutland · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is widely used to prevent and treat thromboembolic events. Traditionally, warfarin has been the drug of choice and, indeed, this drug is effective and provides a more than 60% reduction in stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, OAT entails an increased bleeding risk, and management of this is challenging. Among other things, new oral anticoagulant drugs offer fixed dosing, more predictable pharmacokinetics and fewer interactions with drugs and food. Moreover, these drugs seem to provide an improved benefit-risk ratio with respect to thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in a broad patient population. The new drugs differ from traditional OAT with respect to their mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics, especially with respect to elimination through the kidneys. These drugs may potentially cause bleeding complications in patients with reduced drug excretion due to impaired renal function. Dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban carry the highest risk due to a high degree of renal excretion, whereas the risk for apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban seems lower. Pharmacokinetic studies and data from clinical studies have provided information on how to guide dosing in patients with renal impairment. However, the risk of drug accumulation and bleeding may be amplified by several drug-drug interactions. This article provides a review of the literature on the pharmacology of new anticoagulant drugs with particular focus on the impact of impaired renal function.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsClinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryDrug InteractionsFood-Drug InteractionsGlomerular Filtration RateHumansInactivation, MetabolicKidney DiseasesThromboembolismTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID22931521
OpenAlexW1555652492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.