ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012
Visual search with image modification in age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of Performance-Based Assessment of Daily Living Tasks in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Saccades during visual search in macular degeneration.Vision research · 2022Article
- Measuring image distortions arising from age-related macular degeneration: An Iterative Amsler Grid (IAG).MedComm · 2022Article
- Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Face Recognition in Individuals with Central Vision Loss.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Novel computer-based assessments of everyday visual function in people with age-related macular degeneration.PloS one · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.PloS one · 2017Article
- Low Vision and Plasticity: Implications for Rehabilitation.Annual review of vision science · 2016Review
- Impact of Wet Macular Degeneration on the Execution of Natural Actions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2015Article
- High Tech Aids Low Vision: A Review of Image Processing for the Visually Impaired.Translational vision science & technology · 2015Review
- Impact of simulated central scotomas on visual search in natural scenes.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAMD results in loss of central vision and a dependence on low-resolution peripheral vision. While many image enhancement techniques have been proposed, there is a lack of quantitative comparison of the effectiveness of enhancement. We developed a natural visual search task that uses patients' eye movements as a quantitative and functional measure of the efficacy of image modification.
methodsEye movements of 17 patients (mean age = 77 years) with AMD were recorded while they searched for target objects in natural images. Eight different image modification methods were implemented and included manipulations of local image or edge contrast, color, and crowding. In a subsequent task, patients ranked their preference of the image modifications.
resultsWithin individual participants, there was no significant difference in search duration or accuracy across eight different image manipulations. When data were collapsed across all image modifications, a multivariate model identified six significant predictors for normalized search duration including scotoma size and acuity, as well as interactions among scotoma size, age, acuity, and contrast (P < 0.05). Additionally, an analysis of image statistics showed no correlation with search performance across all image modifications. Rank ordering of enhancement methods based on participants' preference revealed a trend that participants preferred the least modified images (P < 0.05).
conclusionsThere was no quantitative effect of image modification on search performance. A better understanding of low- and high-level components of visual search in natural scenes is necessary to improve future attempts at image enhancement for low vision patients. Different search tasks may require alternative image modifications to improve patient functioning and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.