Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22930725›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Visual search with image modification in age-related macular degeneration.

Emily Wiecek, Mary Lou Jackson, Steven C Dakin, Peter Bex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Eye Movements in Macular Degeneration.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Impact of Wet Macular Degeneration on the Execution of Natural Actions.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Impact of simulated central scotomas on visual search in natural scenes.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily WiecekMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA. emily.wiecek@schepens.harvard.edu
Mary Lou Jackson
Steven C Dakin
Peter Bex

Funding

Enhancement of Dynamic Media for Visually-Impaired PeopleR01EY019281 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BEX, PETER JOHN · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Psychophysical Correlates of Neurodegeneration in GlaucomaR01EY018664 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BEX, PETER JOHN · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018664NEI NIH HHS R01EY018664NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019281NEI NIH HHS R01EY019281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAMD results in loss of central vision and a dependence on low-resolution peripheral vision. While many image enhancement techniques have been proposed, there is a lack of quantitative comparison of the effectiveness of enhancement. We developed a natural visual search task that uses patients' eye movements as a quantitative and functional measure of the efficacy of image modification.

methodsEye movements of 17 patients (mean age = 77 years) with AMD were recorded while they searched for target objects in natural images. Eight different image modification methods were implemented and included manipulations of local image or edge contrast, color, and crowding. In a subsequent task, patients ranked their preference of the image modifications.

resultsWithin individual participants, there was no significant difference in search duration or accuracy across eight different image manipulations. When data were collapsed across all image modifications, a multivariate model identified six significant predictors for normalized search duration including scotoma size and acuity, as well as interactions among scotoma size, age, acuity, and contrast (P < 0.05). Additionally, an analysis of image statistics showed no correlation with search performance across all image modifications. Rank ordering of enhancement methods based on participants' preference revealed a trend that participants preferred the least modified images (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThere was no quantitative effect of image modification on search performance. A better understanding of low- and high-level components of visual search in natural scenes is necessary to improve future attempts at image enhancement for low vision patients. Different search tasks may require alternative image modifications to improve patient functioning and performance.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overContrast SensitivityEye MovementsFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualScotomaVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID22930725
PMCPMC3460389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.