ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2010
Expression of E-Cadherin in breast carcinomas and its association with other biological markers - a prospective study.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrine Mucin-Producing Sweat Gland Carcinoma (EMPSGC) in a Dog: Immunohistochemical Characterization.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status in Gastric Carcinomas with Distinctive Prevalent Cribriform Component.Disease markers · 2018Article
- The paradigm shifts in the management of breast cancer-have we finally arrived?The Indian journal of surgery · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextE-cadherin (E-CD) is an important cell adhesion molecule in normal epithelial cells and has been shown to be an invasion tumor suppressor gene. MATERIALS AND
methodsVarious clinicopathological parameters like age, family history, tumor stage, histological grade, lymph node status and other biological markers were also analyzed. Present study reveals E-CD expression in 65 cases of breast cancer including 41 (63%) cases of pure infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), 11 (16.9%) of pure infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC); another 10 (15.3%) of mixed ductal/lobular type, and remaining 3 (4.6%) miscellaneous types.
resultsNegative E-CD expression was noticed more in advancing age groups (P = 0.01). About 59.2% cases showing negative E-CD expression had family history of breast and/or other cancers. E-CD expression was found significantly higher in cases of pure IDC (55.5%) than in pure ILC cases (18.1%) (P = 0.04). Eleven (68.7%) of the total 16 high-grade IDC cases, revealed negative expression. Both cases of comedo carcinoma revealed negative expression. Three (30%) out of 10 mixed cases revealed negative expression in both ductal and lobular areas, while in remaining 7 cases, positvity was seen in ductal areas only. Invasive cribriform and medullary carcinoma revealed a stronger expression, while negative staining was observed in sweat gland carcinoma. E-CD re-expression was noticed in lymph node tumor deposits. A direct association of E-CD expression with ER expression and an inverse association with that of p53 were also observed (P = 0.001), (P = 0.04).
conclusionsE-CD expression is useful, but limited, in differentiating IDCs from ILCS. Its negative expression correlates with certain poor prognostic parameters reflecting its use as a marker for invasive cancers. It re-expresses at metastatic sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.