ArticleAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias2012
Identification, emotional reactions, and perceived threat to persons with Alzheimer's disease.
Article in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the components of clinical vignettes describing Alzheimer's disease or other dementias: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/rationaleThe identification of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), the emotional reactions, and the perceived threat to AD were compared across 3 Greek samples: 147 primary care health professionals (PCHPs), 74 health and social service graduate students, and 99 laypersons. Within the group of PCHPs, physicians, nurses, and social workers were compared. The factors associated with emotional reactions were examined. Finally, the Emotional Reactions Scale's (ERS) latent structure was validated.
methodsThe participants were asked to identify the disease of a vignette, respond to the ERS and in 3 indices of perceived threat.
resultsThe PCHPs identified AD equally accurate to laypersons. Students and laypersons reported the most intense emotions. Social workers perceived higher consequences than physicians and nurses. Age, personal experience, education, and perceived concern predicted emotional reactions.
conclusionsFindings underscore the importance of implementing education and training actions to increase AD identification, reduce negative emotions, and further advance care for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.