Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22929925›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2012

Using psychological theory to inform methods to optimize the implementation of a hand hygiene intervention.

Veronique M Boscart, Geoff R Fernie, Jae H Lee, Susan B Jaglal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07506915 (The Effect of Hand Hygiene Education With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Hospital Infection Awareness), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07506915 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Hand Hygiene Education With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Hospital Infection Awareness: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiRan2026 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsIntervention (Training) ConditionArmsHand hygiene training using cognitive behavioural therapy techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronique M BoscartSchlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging-RIA & School of Health & Life Sciences and Community Services, Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Geoff R Fernie
Jae H Lee
Susan B Jaglal

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 102887Canadian Institutes of Health Research HTX 80047Canadian Institutes of Health Research XHT 83447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCareful hand hygiene (HH) is the single most important factor in preventing the transmission of infections to patients, but compliance is difficult to achieve and maintain. A lack of understanding of the processes involved in changing staff behaviour may contribute to the failure to achieve success. The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' and administrators' perceived barriers and facilitators to current HH practices and the implementation of a new electronic monitoring technology for HH.

methodsTen key informant interviews (three administrators and seven nurses) were conducted to explore barriers and facilitators related to HH and the impact of the new technology on outcomes. The semi structured interviews were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework by Michie et al. and conducted prior to intervention implementation. Data were explored using an inductive qualitative analysis approach. Data between administrators and nurses were compared.

resultsIn 9 of the 12 domains, nurses and administrators differed in their responses. Administrators believed that nurses have insufficient knowledge and skills to perform HH, whereas the nurses were confident they had the required knowledge and skills. Nurses focused on immediate consequences, whereas administrators highlighted long-term outcomes of the system. Nurses concentrated foremost on their personal safety and their families' safety as a source of motivation to perform HH, whereas administrators identified professional commitment, incentives, and goal setting. Administrators stated that the staff do not have the decision processes in place to judge whether HH is necessary or not. They also highlighted the positive aspects of teams as a social influence, whereas nurses were not interested in group conformity or being compared to others. Nurses described the importance of individual feedback and self-monitoring in order to increase their performance, whereas administrators reported different views.

conclusionsThis study highlights the benefits of using a structured approach based on psychological theory to inform an implementation plan for a behavior change intervention. This work is an essential step towards systematically identifying factors affecting nurses' behaviour associated with HH.

Indexed as

Hand DisinfectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePsychological TheoryEmotionsHospital AdministratorsHumansInterviews as TopicMotivationNursing Staff, HospitalProfessional RoleReproducibility of ResultsSelf EfficacySocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID22929925
PMCPMC3503739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.