Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22929885›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2012

Quantitative relationship between silica exposure and lung cancer mortality in German uranium miners, 1946-2003.

M Sogl, D Taeger, D Pallapies, T Brüning, F Dufey, M Schnelzer, K Straif, L Walsh, M Kreuzer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiation-related health hazards to uranium miners.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. PUMA - pooled uranium miners analysis: cohort profile.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Silicosis and lung cancer: current perspectives.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M SoglDepartment of Radiation Protection and Health, BfS, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Neuherberg 85764, Germany. msogl@bfs.de
D Taeger
D Pallapies
T Brüning
F Dufey
M Schnelzer
K Straif
L Walsh
M Kreuzer
Federal Office for Radiation Protection · DEInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine · DECentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 1996 and 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified silica as carcinogenic to humans. The exposure-response relationship between silica and lung cancer risk, however, is still debated. Data from the German uranium miner cohort study were used to further investigate this relationship.

methodsThe cohort includes 58677 workers with individual information on occupational exposure to crystalline silica in mg m(-3)-years and the potential confounders radon and arsenic based on a detailed job-exposure matrix. In the follow-up period 1946-2003, 2995 miners died from lung cancer. Internal Poisson regression with stratification by age and calendar year was used to estimate the excess relative risk (ERR) per dust-year. Several models including linear, linear quadratic and spline functions were applied. Detailed adjustment for cumulative radon and arsenic exposure was performed.

resultsA piecewise linear spline function with a knot at 10 mg m(-3)-years provided the best model fit. After full adjustment for radon and arsenic no increase in risk <10 mg m(-3)-years was observed. Fixing the parameter estimate of the ERR in this range at 0 provided the best model fit with an ERR of 0.061 (95% confidence interval: 0.039, 0.083) >10 mg m(-3)-years.

conclusionThe study confirms a positive exposure-response relationship between silica and lung cancer, particularly for high exposures.

Indexed as

Arsenic PoisoningCohort StudiesFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiningNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadonRisk FactorsSilicon DioxideUraniumRadonSilicon DioxideUranium

Identifiers

PMID22929885
PMCPMC3461166
OpenAlexW1982282556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.