ArticleBMC systems biology2012
Stochastic Boolean networks: an efficient approach to modeling gene regulatory networks.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- PGBTR: a powerful and general method for inferring bacterial transcriptional regulatory networks.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Reconstructing Dynamic Gene Regulatory Networks Using f-Divergence from Time-Series scRNA-Seq Data.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Dynamic Intervention in Gene Regulatory Networks: A Partially Observed Zero-Sum Markov Game.Control Technology and Applications. Control Technology and Applications · 2024Article
- SPREd: a simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- SPREd: A simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Understanding multimorbidity requires sign-disease networks and higher-order interactions, a perspective.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- Mathematical model of the cell signaling pathway based on the extended Boolean network model with a stochastic process.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Review and assessment of Boolean approaches for inference of gene regulatory networks.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Fast and accurate inference of gene regulatory networks through robust precision matrix estimation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Simulating ATO Mechanism and EGFR Signaling with Fuzzy Logic and Petri Net.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
- Uniform patterns based area-efficient and accurate stochastic computing finite impulse response filter.PloS one · 2021Article
- Integration of single-cell multi-omics for gene regulatory network inference.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- D3GRN: a data driven dynamic network construction method to infer gene regulatory networks.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Kinetic models of hematopoietic differentiation.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019Review
- Representing dynamic biological networks with multi-scale probabilistic models.Communications biology · 2019Article
- An experimental design framework for Markovian gene regulatory networks under stationary control policy.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Robustness of Nutrient Signaling Is Maintained by Interconnectivity Between Signal Transduction Pathways.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Inference of time-delayed gene regulatory networks based on dynamic Bayesian network hybrid learning method.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Towards targeted combinatorial therapy design for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious computational models have been of interest due to their use in the modelling of gene regulatory networks (GRNs). As a logical model, probabilistic Boolean networks (PBNs) consider molecular and genetic noise, so the study of PBNs provides significant insights into the understanding of the dynamics of GRNs. This will ultimately lead to advances in developing therapeutic methods that intervene in the process of disease development and progression. The applications of PBNs, however, are hindered by the complexities involved in the computation of the state transition matrix and the steady-state distribution of a PBN. For a PBN with n genes and N Boolean networks, the complexity to compute the state transition matrix is O(nN22n) or O(nN2n) for a sparse matrix.
resultsThis paper presents a novel implementation of PBNs based on the notions of stochastic logic and stochastic computation. This stochastic implementation of a PBN is referred to as a stochastic Boolean network (SBN). An SBN provides an accurate and efficient simulation of a PBN without and with random gene perturbation. The state transition matrix is computed in an SBN with a complexity of O(nL2n), where L is a factor related to the stochastic sequence length. Since the minimum sequence length required for obtaining an evaluation accuracy approximately increases in a polynomial order with the number of genes, n, and the number of Boolean networks, N, usually increases exponentially with n, L is typically smaller than N, especially in a network with a large number of genes. Hence, the computational efficiency of an SBN is primarily limited by the number of genes, but not directly by the total possible number of Boolean networks. Furthermore, a time-frame expanded SBN enables an efficient analysis of the steady-state distribution of a PBN. These findings are supported by the simulation results of a simplified p53 network, several randomly generated networks and a network inferred from a T cell immune response dataset. An SBN can also implement the function of an asynchronous PBN and is potentially useful in a hybrid approach in combination with a continuous or single-molecule level stochastic model.
conclusionsStochastic Boolean networks (SBNs) are proposed as an efficient approach to modelling gene regulatory networks (GRNs). The SBN approach is able to recover biologically-proven regulatory behaviours, such as the oscillatory dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 network and the dynamic attractors in a T cell immune response network. The proposed approach can further predict the network dynamics when the genes are under perturbation, thus providing biologically meaningful insights for a better understanding of the dynamics of GRNs. The algorithms and methods described in this paper have been implemented in Matlab packages, which are attached as Additional files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.