Trial reportTrials2012
Rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01374022 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Maximum Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver Plus Titrated PEEP Versus ARDSNet Strategy for ARDS), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Maximum Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver Plus Titrated PEEP Versus ARDSNet Strategy for ARDS
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Statistical analysis plan for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART). A randomized controlled trial.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaTrial
- Influence Of "Open Lung" Recruitment On Ards In Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2022Article
- Should the ART trial change our practice?Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- 'Lung-protective' ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: still a challenge?Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Article
- Recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- [The old man and the I sea U : Essay on faith, fate and evidence - after the manner of Hemingway].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Article
- Recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: The safe way is the best way.World journal of critical care medicine · 2015Review
- Evaluation of lung recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome using computer simulation.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumothorax.Journal of thoracic disease · 2014Review
- Does the use of high PEEP levels prevent ventilator-induced lung injury?Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaReview
- Use of thoracic electrical impedance tomography as an auxiliary tool for alveolar recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: case report and brief literature review.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Alveolar recruitment followed by ventilation at optimal titrated PEEP may reduce ventilator-induced lung injury and improve oxygenation in patients with ARDS, but the effects on mortality and other clinical outcomes remain unknown. This article reports the rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART). METHODS/
designART is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized (concealed), controlled trial, which aims to determine if maximum stepwise alveolar recruitment associated with PEEP titration is able to increase 28-day survival in patients with ARDS compared to conventional treatment (ARDSNet strategy). We will enroll adult patients with ARDS of less than 72 h duration. The intervention group will receive an alveolar recruitment maneuver, with stepwise increases of PEEP achieving 45 cmH2O and peak pressure of 60 cmH2O, followed by ventilation with optimal PEEP titrated according to the static compliance of the respiratory system. In the control group, mechanical ventilation will follow a conventional protocol (ARDSNet). In both groups, we will use controlled volume mode with low tidal volumes (4 to 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight) and targeting plateau pressure ≤30 cmH2O. The primary outcome is 28-day survival, and the secondary outcomes are: length of ICU stay; length of hospital stay; pneumothorax requiring chest tube during first 7 days; barotrauma during first 7 days; mechanical ventilation-free days from days 1 to 28; ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month survival. ART is an event-guided trial planned to last until 520 events (deaths within 28 days) are observed. These events allow detection of a hazard ratio of 0.75, with 90% power and two-tailed type I error of 5%. All analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: If the ART strategy with maximum recruitment and PEEP titration improves 28-day survival, this will represent a notable advance to the care of ARDS patients. Conversely, if the ART strategy is similar or inferior to the current evidence-based strategy (ARDSNet), this should also change current practice as many institutions routinely employ recruitment maneuvers and set PEEP levels according to some titration method.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01374022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.