Trial reportTrials2012
Scaling-up from an implementation trial to state-wide coverage: results from the preliminary Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study.
Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of real-world diabetes prevention programs: learnings from the last 15 years.Implementation science : IS · 2015 · on this mapPooled it
- Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force.Annals of internal medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Effects of total fat intake on body weight.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program.BMC public health · 2018Trial
- Implementation salvage experiences from the Melbourne diabetes prevention study.BMC public health · 2012Trial
- Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- The challenge of participatory projects for physical activity promotion: What to scale and how to scale?PloS one · 2025Article
- Public Health Approaches to Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: the US National Diabetes Prevention Program and Beyond.Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
- NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: formative evaluation of the programme in early phase implementation.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Pathways for scaling up public health interventions.BMC public health · 2017Review
- Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.Lancet (London, England) · 2016Review
- Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2015Article
- Treatment for overweight and obesity in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ open · 2014Article
- Lifestyle and the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes: A Status Report.American journal of lifestyle medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe successful Greater Green Triangle Diabetes Prevention Program (GGT DPP), a small implementation trial, has been scaled-up to the Victorian state-wide 'Life!' programme with over 10,000 individuals enrolled. The Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) is an evaluation of the translation from the GGT DPP to the Life! programme. We report results from the preliminary phase (pMDPS) of this evaluation.
methodsThe pMDPS is a randomised controlled trial with 92 individuals aged 50 to 75 at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes randomised to Life! or usual care. Intervention consisted of six structured 90-minute group sessions: five fortnightly sessions and the final session at 8 months. Participants underwent anthropometric and laboratory tests at baseline and 12 months, and provided self-reported psychosocial, dietary, and physical activity measures. Intervention group participants additionally underwent these tests at 3 months. Paired t tests were used to analyse within-group changes over time. Chi-square tests were used to analyse differences between groups in goals met at 12 months. Differences between groups for changes over time were tested with generalised estimating equations and analysis of covariance.
resultsIntervention participants significantly improved at 12 months in mean body mass index (-0.98 kg/m(2), standard error (SE) = 0.26), weight (-2.65 kg, SE = 0.72), waist circumference (-7.45 cm, SE = 1.15), and systolic blood pressure (-3.18 mmHg, SE = 1.26), increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (0.07 mmol/l, SE = 0.03), reduced energy from total (-2.00%, SE = 0.78) and saturated fat (-1.54%, SE = 0.41), and increased fibre intake (1.98 g/1,000 kcal energy, SE = 0.47). In controls, oral glucose at 2 hours deteriorated (0.59 mmol/l, SE = 0.27). Only waist circumference reduced significantly (-4.02 cm, SE = 0.95).Intervention participants significantly outperformed controls over 12 months for body mass index and fibre intake. After baseline adjustment, they also showed greater weight loss and reduced saturated fat versus total energy intake.At least 5% weight loss was achieved by 32% of intervention participants versus 0% controls.
conclusionspMDPS results indicate that scaling-up from implementation trial to state-wide programme is possible. The system design for Life! was fit for purpose of scaling-up from efficacy to effectiveness.
trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000507280.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.