ArticleBMC health services research2012
Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model.
Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mechanisms to build research capacity in the rural health workplace: a realist synthesis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review.Health research policy and systems · 2018Pooled it
- The role and impact of research positions within health care settings in allied health: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Exploring the research interest, capacity and culture of NHS staff in South-East Scotland and changes in attitudes to research following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Using Social Network Analysis to Inform Implementation Science Infrastructure Development.Global implementation research and applications · 2025Article
- Collaborations between health services and educational institutions to develop research capacity in health services and health service staff: a systematic scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Partnership-building considerations for implementation science in learning health systems: a case study of the Implementation Science Collaborative in Alberta, Canada.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- A framework for sustainable capacity-building for collaborative North-South translational health research and training in a resource-constrained setting.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- The research interest, capacity and culture of NHS staff in South East Scotland and changes in attitude to research following the pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of an Academic-Practice Team Approach on Research Capacity Building of Nurses and Public Health Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Research Capacity and Culture of Health Professionals Working with Women, Children and Families at an Australian Public Hospital: A Cross Sectional Observational Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Health research capacity of professional and technical personnel in a first-class tertiary hospital in northwest China: multilevel repeated measurement, 2013-2017, a pilot study.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- An academic perspective of participation in healthcare redesign.Health research policy and systems · 2019Article
- Longitudinal evaluation of a knowledge translation role in occupational therapy.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the research capacity and culture of allied health professionals in a large regional public health service.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Article
- Uncovering the mechanisms of research capacity development in health and social care: a realist synthesis.Health research policy and systems · 2018Review
- How do NHS organisations plan research capacity development? Strategies, strengths, and opportunities for improvement.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith current policy in healthcare research, in the United Kingdom and internationally, focused on development of research excellence in individuals and teams, building capacity for implementation and translation of research is paramount among the professionals who use that research in daily practice. The judicious use of research outcomes and evaluation of best evidence and practice in healthcare is integrally linked to the research capacity and capabilities of the workforce. In addition to promoting high quality research, mechanisms for actively enhancing research capacity more generally must be in place to address the complexities that both undermine and facilitate this activity.
methodsA comprehensive collaborative model for building research capacity in one health professional group, speech and language therapy, was developed in a region within the UK and is presented here. The North East of England and the strong research ethos of this profession in addressing complex interventions offered a fertile context for developing and implementing a model which integrated the healthcare and university sectors. Two key frameworks underpin this model. The first addresses the individual participants' potential trajectory from research consciousness to research participative to research active. The second embeds a model developed for general practitioners into a broader framework of practice-academic partnership and knowledge and skills exchange, and considers external drivers and impacts on practice and patient outcomes as key elements. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The integration of practice and academia has been successful in building a culture of research activity within one healthcare profession in a region in the UK and has resulted, to date, in a series of research related outcomes. Understanding the key components of this partnership and the explicit strategies used has driven the implementation of the model and are discussed here.
conclusionsA strong, equitable collaboration between clinical and academic partners working towards a common outcome can enhance the use of research within the healthcare workforce and contribute actively to the research process. A set of propositions are specified to facilitate both transferability of this partnership model to other professional groups and clinical teams and evaluation of the model components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.