ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013
WikiGWA: an open platform for collecting and using genome-wide association results.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integration of Molecular Interactome and Targeted Interaction Analysis to Identify a COPD Disease Network Module.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of discovered genetic variants from genome-wide association (GWA) studies (GWAS) has been growing rapidly. Centralized efforts such as the National Human Genome Research Institute's GWAS catalog provide regular updates and a convenient interface for quick lookup. However, the catalog entries are manually curated and rely on data from published articles. Other tools such as SNPedia (http://www.snpedia.com) collect published results regarding functional consequences of genetic variations. Here, we propose an approach that allows individual investigators to share their GWA results through an open platform. Unlike GWAS catalog or SNPedia, wikiGWA collects first-hand GWAS results and in a much larger scale. Investigators are not only able to post a much larger amount of results, but also post results from unpublished studies, which could alleviate publication bias and facilitate identification of weak signals. Our interface allows for flexible and fast queries, and the query results are formatted to work seamlessly with the LocusZoom program for visualization and annotation. We here describe wikiGWA, made publically available at http://www.wikiGWA.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.