Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22928741›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging

Validation of FDG uptake in the arterial wall as an imaging biomarker of atherosclerotic plaques with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT).

Monica Bucci, Carina Mari Aparici, Randy Hawkins, Steve Bacharach, Carole Schrek, Suchun Cheng, Elizabeth Tong, Sandeep Arora, Eugenio Parati, Max Wintermark

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Monica BucciDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Neurology, Cerebrovascular Unit, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Carina Mari Aparici
Randy Hawkins
Steve Bacharach
Carole Schrek
Suchun Cheng
Elizabeth Tong
Sandeep Arora
Eugenio Parati
Max Wintermark
University of California, San Francisco · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFrom the literature, the prevalence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in large artery atherosclerotic plaques shows great heterogeneity. We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients who underwent FDG-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of their whole body, to evaluate FDG uptake in the arterial wall. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 100 whole-body PET-CT scans. The PET images coregistered with CT were reviewed for abnormal 18F-FDG uptake. The mean standard uptake value (SUV) was measured in regions of interest (ROIs). The prevalence of PET+ plaques was determined based on the qualitative PET review, used as the gold standard in a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine an optimal threshold for the quantitative PET analysis.

resultsThe qualitative, visual assessment demonstrated FDG uptake in the arterial walls of 26 patients. A total of 85 slices exhibited FDG uptake within the arterial wall of 37 artery locations. 11, 17, and 2 patients exhibited FDG uptake within the wall of carotid arteries, of the aorta, and of the iliac arteries, respectively. Only 4 of the 26 patients had positive FDG uptake in more than one artery location. In terms of quantitative analysis, a threshold of 2.8 SUV was associated with a negative predictive value of 99.4% and a positive predictive value of 100% to predict qualitative PET+ plaques. A threshold of 1.8 SUV was associated with a negative predictive value of 100% and a positive predictive value of 99.4%. Area under the ROC curve was .839.

conclusionThe prevalence of PET uptake in arterial walls in a consecutive population of asymptomatic patients is low and usually confined to one type of artery, and its clinical relevance in terms of vulnerability to ischemic events remains to be determined.

Indexed as

AngiographyArteriesAtherosclerosisBiomarkersFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAtherosclerotic plaquescomputed tomographypositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID22928741
PMCPMC6069964
OpenAlexW1608705942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.