Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22928654›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2012

Probiotics to improve outcomes of colic in the community: protocol for the Baby Biotics randomised controlled trial.

Valerie Sung, Harriet Hiscock, Mimi Tang, Fiona K Mensah, Ralf G Heine, Amanda Stock, Elissa York, Ronald G Barr, Melissa Wake

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Probiotics to prevent infantile colic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Probiotics in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The effect of symbiotic in the treatment of infantile colic: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Infantile Colic Treated WithFrontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie SungRoyal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia. valerie.sung@rch.org.au
Harriet Hiscock
Mimi Tang
Fiona K Mensah
Ralf G Heine
Amanda Stock
Elissa York
Ronald G Barr
Melissa Wake
Royal Children's Hospital · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUChild and Family Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfant colic, characterised by excessive crying/fussing for no apparent cause, affects up to 20% of infants under three months of age and is a great burden to families, health professionals and the health system. One promising approach to improving its management is the use of oral probiotics. The Baby Biotics trial aims to determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 is effective in reducing crying in infants less than three months old (<13.0 weeks) with infant colic when compared to placebo. METHODS/

design

designDouble-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in Melbourne, Australia.

participants160 breast and formula fed infants less than three months old who present either to clinical or community services and meet Wessel's criteria of crying and/or fussing.

interventionOral once-daily Lactobacillus reuteri (1x108 cfu) versus placebo for one month. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Infant crying/fussing time per 24 hours at one month. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: i) number of episodes of infant crying/fussing per 24 hours and ii) infant sleep duration per 24 hours (at 7, 14, 21, 28 days and 6 months); iii) maternal mental health scores, iv) family functioning scores, v) parent quality adjusted life years scores, and vi) intervention cost-effectiveness (at one and six months); and vii) infant faecal microbiota diversity, viii) infant faecal calprotectin levels and ix) Eschericia coli load (at one month only). ANALYSIS: Primary and secondary outcomes for the intervention versus control groups will be compared with t tests and non-parametric tests for continuous data and chi squared tests for dichotomous data. Regression models will be used to adjust for potential confounding factors. Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. DISCUSSION: An effective, practical and acceptable intervention for infant colic would represent a major clinical advance. Because our trial includes breast and formula-fed babies, our results should generalise to most babies with colic. If cost-effective, the intervention's simplicity is such that it could be widely taken up as a new standard of care in the primary and secondary care sectors.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.

Indexed as

ColicDouble-Blind MethodHumansInfantProbioticsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22928654
PMCPMC3508922
OpenAlexW2165976173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.