ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2011
Will silk fibroin nanofiber scaffolds ever hold a useful place in Translational Regenerative Medicine?
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- In-vivo evaluation of silk fibroin small-diameter vascular grafts: state of art of preclinical studies and animal models.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Article
- Editorial: Biomaterials for Skin Wound Repair: Tissue Engineering, Guided Regeneration, and Wound Scarring Prevention.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Exosomes of adult human fibroblasts cultured on 3D silk fibroin nonwovens intensely stimulate neoangiogenesis.Burns & trauma · 2021Article
- Three-Layered Silk Fibroin Tubular Scaffold for the Repair and Regeneration of Small Caliber Blood Vessels: From Design toFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Incorporation of Exogenous RGD Peptide and Inter-Species Blending as Strategies for Enhancing Human Corneal Limbal Epithelial Cell Growth on Bombyx mori Silk Fibroin Membranes.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Presently, some view silk fibroin-based biomaterials as obsolete, being outperformed by a host of newly discovered biomaterials. But several lines of evidence support the notion that silk fibroin proteins, especially those from B. mori and spiders and their recombinant forms, particularly in the form of electrospun nanofiber scaffolds, still represent promising tools for human tissue engineering/regeneration. Inevitably, the allure of recently reported biomaterials turns away many scientists and resources from the aim of more deeply elucidating the biological interactions of the various kinds of silk fibroin nanofiber scaffolds in vivo. But, even the biological features of newly reported biomaterials are not investigated in adequate depth. Hence, collaborative efforts among biomaterialists, biomedical experts, and private firms must be undertaken on a much greater scale than hitherto done to assess the real usefulness of silk fibroin proteins, thereby allowing or denying their useful introduction into the fields of Translational Regenerative Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22928155PMC3415940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.