ArticleInternational journal of evolutionary biology2012
Genetic innovation in vertebrates: gypsy integrase genes and other genes derived from transposable elements.
Article in International journal of evolutionary biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imagin: An Integrase-Like Gene Conserved Across Malacostracan Crustaceans Derived From a Ginger1 DNA Transposon.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Human paraneoplastic antigen Ma2 (PNMA2) forms icosahedral capsids that can be engineered for mRNA delivery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Transposable element-derived sequences in vertebrate development.Mobile DNA · 2021Review
- Endogenous Retroviruses in Fish Genomes: From Relics of Past Infections to Evolutionary Innovations?Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Short interspersed DNA elements and miRNAs: a novel hidden gene regulation layer in zebrafish?Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015Article
- Evolutionary impact of transposable elements on genomic diversity and lineage-specific innovation in vertebrates.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015Review
- Target capture during Mos1 transposition.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Constraint and opportunity in genome innovation.RNA biology · 2014Review
- Something silent this way forms: the functional organization of the repressive nuclear compartment.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to their ability to drive DNA rearrangements and to serve as a source of new coding and regulatory sequences, transposable elements (TEs) are considered as powerful evolutionary agents within genomes. In this paper, we review the mechanism of molecular domestication, which corresponds to the formation of new genes derived from TE sequences. Many genes derived from retroelements and DNA transposons have been identified in mammals and other vertebrates, some of them fulfilling essential functions for the development and survival of their host organisms. We will particularly focus on the evolution and expression of Gypsy integrase (GIN) genes, which have been formed from ancient event(s) of molecular domestication and have evolved differentially in some vertebrate sublineages. What we describe here is probably only the tip of the evolutionary iceberg, and future genome analyses will certainly uncover new TE-derived genes and biological functions driving genetic innovation in vertebrates and other organisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.