Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927954›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Expression of wild-type Rp1 protein in Rp1 knock-in mice rescues the retinal degeneration phenotype.

Qin Liu, Rob W J Collin, Frans P M Cremers, Anneke I den Hollander, L Ingeborgh van den Born, Eric A Pierce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autosomal Dominant RP1 c.2613dupA (p.Arg872Thrfs*2) Variant Retinitis Pigmentosa Shows Linear Loss of the Ellipsoid Zone over Time with Highly Variable Phenotype.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations inJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BiallelicMolecular vision · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Molecular basis for photoreceptor outer segment architecture.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qin LiuBerman-Gund Laboratory for the Study of Retinal Degenerations, Ocular Genomics Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Rob W J Collin
Frans P M Cremers
Anneke I den Hollander
L Ingeborgh van den Born
Eric A Pierce
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRotterdam Eye Hospital · NL

Funding

Precision Medicine for Inherited Retinal DegenerationsR01EY012910 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Eric A Pierce · 1999 to 2026
$15.9M
NEI NIH HHS EY12910NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the retinitis pigmentosa 1 (RP1) gene are a common cause of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), and have also been found to cause autosomal recessive RP (arRP) in a few families. The 33 dominant mutations and 6 recessive RP1 mutations identified to date are all nonsense or frameshift mutations, and almost exclusively (38 out of 39) are located in the 4(th) and final exon of RP1. To better understand the underlying disease mechanisms of and help develop therapeutic strategies for RP1 disease, we performed a series of human genetic and animal studies using gene targeted and transgenic mice. Here we report that a frameshift mutation in the 3(rd) exon of RP1 (c.686delC; p.P229QfsX35) found in a patient with recessive RP1 disease causes RP in the homozygous state, whereas the heterozygous carriers are unaffected, confirming that haploinsufficiency is not the causative mechanism for RP1 disease. We then generated Rp1 knock-in mice with a nonsense Q662X mutation in exon 4, as well as Rp1 transgenic mice carrying a wild-type BAC Rp1 transgene. The Rp1-Q662X allele produces a truncated Rp1 protein, and homozygous Rp1-Q662X mice experience a progressive photoreceptor degeneration characterized disorganization of photoreceptor outer segments. This phenotype could be prevented by expression of a normal amount of Rp1 protein from the BAC transgene without removal of the mutant Rp1-Q662X protein. Over-expression of Rp1 protein in additional BAC Rp1 transgenic lines resulted in retinal degeneration. These findings suggest that the truncated Rp1-Q662X protein does not exert a toxic gain-of-function effect. These results also imply that in principle gene augmentation therapy could be beneficial for both recessive and dominant RP1 patients, but the levels of RP1 protein delivered for therapy will have to be carefully controlled.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Knock-In TechniquesPhenotypeAdultAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceExonsEye ProteinsGenetic TherapyHaploinsufficiencyHumansMiceMice, TransgenicMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPhotoreceptor CellsEye ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsRP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22927954
PMCPMC3424119
OpenAlexW2160252651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.