Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927803›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

Modeling of gap gene expression in Drosophila Kruppel mutants.

Konstantin Kozlov, Svetlana Surkova, Ekaterina Myasnikova, John Reinitz, Maria Samsonova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Negative Feedbacks on De Novo Pyrimidines Biosynthesis inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Kruppel-like Factors in Skeletal Physiology and Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamic Modeling of Transcriptional Gene Regulatory Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konstantin KozlovDepartment of Computational Biology/Center for Advanced Studies, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Svetlana Surkova
Ekaterina Myasnikova
John Reinitz
Maria Samsonova

Funding

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODEL OF GENE REGULATION IN DROSOPHILAR01RR007801 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI REINITZ, JOHN B. · 1992 to 2011
$6.3M
Physiological Model of Gene Regulation in DrosophilaR01OD010936 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALLESINA, STEFANO, LUDWIG, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2023
$6.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR007801NCRR NIH HHS RR07801NIH HHS R01 OD010936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmentation gene network in Drosophila embryo solves the fundamental problem of embryonic patterning: how to establish a periodic pattern of gene expression, which determines both the positions and the identities of body segments. The gap gene network constitutes the first zygotic regulatory tier in this process. Here we have applied the systems-level approach to investigate the regulatory effect of gap gene Kruppel (Kr) on segmentation gene expression. We acquired a large dataset on the expression of gap genes in Kr null mutants and demonstrated that the expression levels of these genes are significantly reduced in the second half of cycle 14A. To explain this novel biological result we applied the gene circuit method which extracts regulatory information from spatial gene expression data. Previous attempts to use this formalism to correctly and quantitatively reproduce gap gene expression in mutants for a trunk gap gene failed, therefore here we constructed a revised model and showed that it correctly reproduces the expression patterns of gap genes in Kr null mutants. We found that the remarkable alteration of gap gene expression patterns in Kr mutants can be explained by the dynamic decrease of activating effect of Cad on a target gene and exclusion of Kr gene from the complex network of gap gene interactions, that makes it possible for other interactions, in particular, between hb and gt, to come into effect. The successful modeling of the quantitative aspects of gap gene expression in mutant for the trunk gap gene Kr is a significant achievement of this work. This result also clearly indicates that the oversimplified representation of transcriptional regulation in the previous models is one of the reasons for unsuccessful attempts of mutant simulations.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalMutationAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene ExpressionKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsKr protein, DrosophilaKruppel-Like Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22927803
PMCPMC3426564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.