Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22927674›Full record

Trial reportChild maltreatment2012

Is a structured, manualized, evidence-based treatment protocol culturally competent and equivalently effective among American Indian parents in child welfare?

Mark Chaffin, David Bard, Dolores Subia Bigfoot, Erin J Maher

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Child maltreatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Provider Attitudes and Self-Efficacy When Delivering a Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Module: An Exploratory Study.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How effective is the early support programMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark ChaffinUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA. mark-chaffin@ouhsc.edu
David Bard
Dolores Subia Bigfoot
Erin J Maher

Funding

Mixed-Methods Study of EBP Sustainment in a Statewide Service SystemR01MH072961 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY · 2005 to 2016
$5.8M
Effectiveness Trial Project SafeCare for Child NeglectR01MH065667 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI CHAFFIN, MARK J. · 2003 to 2007
$3.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065667NIMH NIH HHS R01MH065667NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH072961NIMH NIH HHS R01MH072961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a statewide implementation, the manualized SafeCare home-based model was effective in reducing child welfare recidivism and producing high client satisfaction. Concerns about the effectiveness and acceptability of structured, manualized models with American Indians have been raised in the literature, but have rarely been directly tested. This study tests recidivism reduction equivalency and acceptability among American Indian parents. A subpopulation of 354 American Indian parents was drawn from a larger trial that compared services with versus without modules of the SafeCare model. Outcomes were 6-year recidivism, pre/post/follow-up measures of depression and child abuse potential, and posttreatment consumer ratings of working alliance, service satisfaction, and cultural competency. Recidivism reduction among American Indian parents was found to be equivalent for cases falling within customary SafeCare inclusion criteria. When extended to cases outside customary inclusion boundaries, there was no apparent recidivism advantage or disadvantage. Contrary to concerns, SafeCare had higher consumer ratings of cultural competency, working alliance, service quality, and service benefit. Findings support using SafeCare with American Indians parents who meet customary SafeCare inclusion criteria. Findings do not support concerns in the literature that a manualized, structured, evidence-based model might be less effective or culturally unacceptable for American Indians.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyAdultChildChild AbuseChild WelfareClinical ProtocolsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleOklahomaOutcome Assessment, Health CareParentsPropensity Score

Identifiers

PMID22927674
PMCPMC4443699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.