ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012
Cognition in insects.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012Pooled it
- Evolution of neural circuitry and cognition.Biology letters · 2024Review
- An internal expectation guidesScience advances · 2022Article
- Standardised bioassays reveal that mosquitoes learn to avoid compounds used in chemical vector control after a single sub-lethal exposure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Awareness and consciousness in humans and animals - neural and behavioral correlates in an evolutionary perspective.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Neural architectures in the light of comparative connectomics.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021Review
- Review
- The Combined Effects ofBiology · 2020Article
- Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not "One Cognition".Journal of Intelligence · 2020Review
- Arthropod Intelligence? The Case forFrontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Interactive rhythms across species: the evolutionary biology of animal chorusing and turn-taking.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2019Article
- Statistical physics of liquid brains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
- Effects of sublethal doses of clothianidin and/or V. destructor on honey bee (Apis mellifera) self-grooming behavior and associated gene expression.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Challenges for theories of consciousness: seeing or knowing, the missing ingredient and how to deal with panpsychism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Mind Control: How Parasites Manipulate Cognitive Functions in Their Insect Hosts.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Does Spatial Navigation Have a Blind-Spot? Visiocentrism Is Not Enough to Explain the Navigational Behavior Comprehensively.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017Article
- The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2016Article
- Olfactory Cues from Pathogenic Fungus Affect the Direction of Motion of Termites, Coptotermes formosanus.Journal of chemical ecology · 2015Article
- Solving a novel confinement problem by spartaeine salticids that are predisposed to solve problems in the context of predation.Animal cognition · 2015Article
- The evolution of self-control.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A traditional view of cognition is that it involves an internal process that represents, tracks or predicts an external process. This is not a general characteristic of all complex neural processing or feedback control, but rather implies specific forms of processing giving rise to specific behavioural capabilities. In this paper, I will review the evidence for such capabilities in insect navigation and learning. Do insects know where they are, or do they only know what to do? Do they learn what stimuli mean, or do they only learn how to behave?
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.